Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935369›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2022

The Utility of Peripheral Blood Leucocyte Ratios as Biomarkers in Neonatal Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Juanjuan Zhang, Jun'an Zeng, Liangjuan Zhang, Xiping Yu, Jinzhen Guo, Zhankui Li

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. [Prognostic utility of inflammatory indexes in critically ill newborns].Revista medica del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social · 2023
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Juanjuan ZhangDepartment of Neonatology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jun'an ZengDepartment of Neonatology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Liangjuan ZhangDepartment of Neonatology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Xiping YuDepartment of Neonatology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Jinzhen GuoDepartment of Neonatology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Zhankui LiDepartment of Neonatology, Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital, Xi'an, China.
Northwest Women's and Children's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Early stage diagnosis of neonatal sepsis (NS) remains a major roadblock due to non-specific symptoms and the absence of precise laboratory index tests. The full blood count is a relatively cheap, universal, and rapid diagnostic test. Method: This study assessed the diagnostic accuracies of immature-to-total neutrophil ratio (ITR), immature-to-mature neutrophil ratio (IMR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) used in the diagnosis of NS. Included studies were retrieved by searching four major databases and relevant references, and reviewed based on the inclusion/exclusion criteria. Pooled sensitivities and specificities were calculated, Results: Finally, 38 studies passed the eligibility criteria. A total of thirty-one studies (6,221 neonates) included data on the ITR, eight studies (1,230 neonates) included data on the IMR, seven studies (751 neonates) included data on the NLR, and two studies (283 neonates) included data on the PLR. The summary sensitivity estimates with 95% confidence interval (CI) for the ITR, IMR, NLR, and PLR tests were, respectively, 0.74 (95% CI: 0.66-0.80), 0.74 (95% CI: 0.54-0.88), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.68-0.78), and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.55-1.00). The summary specificity values for the ITR, IMR, NLR, and PLR tests were 0.83 (95% CI: 0.77-0.87), 0.89 (95% CI: 0.80-0.94), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57-0.79), and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.81-1.00), respectively. The area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curves for the ITR, IMR, and NLR tests were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.82-0.88), 0.91 (95% CI: 0.88-0.93), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79). The PLR could not be evaluated because only two studies included pertinent data. Conclusion: The NLR test might not be sufficiently accurate in precisely diagnosing NS. The ITR and IMR tests alone can improve the accuracy of NS diagnosis, but the marked heterogeneity and the limited number of studies prevented us from reaching any definitive conclusions. Thus, further studies are warranted to validate these findings. Systematic Review Registration: [https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/], identifier [CRD42021247850].

Indexed as

immature-to-mature neutrophil ratioimmature-to-total neutrophil ratiometa-analysisneonatal sepsisneutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratioplatelet-to-lymphocyte ratio

Identifiers

PMID35935369
PMCPMC9353072
OpenAlexW4286447659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.