SynthesisFrontiers in pediatrics2022
The safety of blinatumomab in pediatric patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Frontiers in pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 44 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative evaluation of cognitive behavioural therapy versus standard treatment in temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Tobacco smoking and its impact on pain intensity of temporomandibular disorders: A systematic review and metanalysis.Journal of oral rehabilitation · 2025Pooled it
- Low-level laser treatment's ability to reduce dry socket pain.Acta odontologica Scandinavica · 2024Pooled it
- Prenatal incidence of cleft lip/palate and cocaine abuse in parents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Gene sequencing applications to combat oral-cavity related disorders: a systematic review with meta-analysis.BMC oral health · 2024Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of blinatumomab in children with relapsed/refractory B cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Pooled it
- Research trends and hotspots of CAR-T cell therapy for acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A bibliometric analysis.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2026Article
- Efficacy and safety of blinatumomab combination therapy in high-risk B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Oncology letters · 2026Article
- Neurotoxicity of Immunotherapy: Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor-Related Encephalitis vs. Immune Effector Cell-Associated Neurotoxicity Syndrome.World journal of oncology · 2026Review
- Blinatumomab exposure prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation is associated with increased Epstein-Barr virus reactivation.Annals of hematology · 2026Article
- Monoclonal Antibodies as a Breakthrough in Personalised Leukaemia Therapy: What Pharmacists and Doctors Should Know.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Blinatumomab Administration in Pediatric B-Lineage ALL: Expert Recommendations From the Children's Oncology Group.Clinical journal of oncology nursing · 2025Article
- Review
- Blinatumomab in pediatric B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Review
- Concentrated Growth Factors and Bone Grafting in Maxillary Sinus Lift: A Systematic Review.International journal of dentistry · 2025Review
- Bispecific T-cell engagers in childhood B-acute lymphoblastic leukemia.Haematologica · 2024Review
- The Role of Sulfhydryl (Thiols) Groups in Oral and Periodontal Diseases.Biomedicines · 2024Article
- Light gradient boosting-based prediction of quality of life among oral cancer-treated patients.BMC oral health · 2024Article
- Review
- Prevalence of Bruxism in alcohol abusers: a systematic review conducted according to PRISMA guidelines and the cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions.BMC oral health · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Blinatumomab is a bispecific CD19-directed CD3 T-cell engager that has proven efficacy in children with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Despite its efficacy, it has also been associated with the development of potentially serious adverse events such as the cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic events. The present meta-analysis aimed to assess the safety profile of blinatumomab in terms of serious adverse events, CRS, and neurologic events (such as seizure and encephalopathy) in pediatric patients with B-cell ALL. Methods and findings: A systematic review was conducted in Pubmed up to December 10, 2021 to retain pediatric clinical trials on blinatumomab. A random effect meta-analysis approach was used. This study followed the PRISMA statement. Four out of the 255 initial references were selected, of which 2 were phase 1/2 clinical trials and 2 phase 3 clinical trials. Blinatumomab was associated with a lower risk of serious adverse events (Risk ratio RR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.32-0.99), febrile neutropenia (RR, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.06-0.26), infection (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.29-0.56), and grade ≥ 3 adverse events (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.67-0.93) compared to chemotherapy. No difference in the risk of CRS (RR, 8.37; 95% CI, 0.27-260.97) and seizure (RR, 6.43; 95% CI, 0.79-53.08) was observed between groups, while for encephalopathy a higher risk was associated with blinatumomab compared to chemotherapy (RR, 8.90; 95% CI, 1.08-73.29). Conclusion: Our data support the good safety profile of bliantumomab in treating pediatric patients with B-ALL.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.