Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935320›Full record

Trial reportContrast media & molecular imaging2022

Comparison and Clinical Value of Ciprofol and Propofol in Intraoperative Adverse Reactions, Operation, Resuscitation, and Satisfaction of Patients under Painless Gastroenteroscopy Anesthesia.

Xingqu Chen, Ping Guo, Li Yang, Zhuoling Liu, Deshui Yu

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xingqu ChenThe Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Department of Anesthesiology, Yibin, China.
Ping GuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, The 2nd Affiliated Hospital of Chengdu Medical College, Nuclear Industry 416 Hospital, Chengdu 610051, Sichuan Province, China.
Li YangThe Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Department of Anesthesiology, Yibin, China.
Zhuoling LiuThe Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Department of Anesthesiology, Yibin, China.
Deshui YuThe Second People's Hospital of Yibin, Department of Anesthesiology, Yibin, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4372-4303
Second People’s Hospital of Yibin · CNChengdu Medical College · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the comparison and clinical value of ciprofol and propofol for painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in terms of intraoperative adverse reactions, operation, resuscitation, and satisfaction of patients. Methods: A total of 96 patients who underwent painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia in our hospital from June 2021 to January 2022 were enrolled. The cases were randomly assigned into research group and control group. The control group received propofol anesthesia ( Results: The overall satisfaction of the study group was higher than that of the control group ( Conclusion: In painless gastroenteroscopy, compared with propofol, ciprofol is equally safe and effective for patients and will not cause early cognitive dysfunction after operation, which is a good choice in painless gastroenteroscopy anesthesia. In addition, ciprofol has significant advantages in patient and physician satisfaction, especially in injection pain. This trial is registered with ChiCTR2100045400.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaPropofolAnesthetics, IntravenousHumansPainPatient SatisfactionPersonal SatisfactionAnesthetics, IntravenousPropofol

Identifiers

PMID35935320
PMCPMC9314164
OpenAlexW4285728770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.