ArticleContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Diagnostic Value of Image Features of Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Intracranial Hemorrhage and Cerebral Infarction.
Article in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the differential diagnosis value of routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) in hyperacute intracranial hemorrhage (HICH) and hyperacute cerebral infarction (HCI). Fifty-five patients with HICH were set as group A, and 55 patients with HCI were selected as group B. All the patients underwent routine MRI and DWI examinations. The morphological distribution and signal characteristics (low, high, or mixed) of the lesions in the two groups were recorded. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of routine MRI and DWI were compared for distinguishing HICH and HCI. The results suggested that the lesions in patients with HICH were mainly manifested as mixed signals (40 cases), while those in patients with HCI showed high signals (48 cases). HICH occurred in the basal ganglia in 44 cases, in the brain stem in 6 cases, in the cerebellum in 4 cases, in the cerebral cortex in 0 cases, and in the corpus callosum in 1 case. HCI occurred in the basal ganglia area, brain stem, cerebellum, cerebral cortex, and corpus callosum in 5, 3, 35, 12, and 0 cases, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy, specificity, and sensitivity of DWI for HICH and HCI were significantly higher than those of routine MRI (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.