Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935228›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2022

Comparative analysis of aroma components and quality of

Junjie Chen, Qianying Li, Jie Wang, Weizhe Chen, Qikai Zheng, Qingping Zhong, Xiang Fang, Zhenlin Liao

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. ProbioticFood science & nutrition · 2024
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Junjie ChenCollege of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Qianying LiCollege of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Jie WangCollege of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Weizhe ChenCollege of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Qikai ZhengCollege of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Qingping ZhongCollege of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Xiang FangCollege of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.
Zhenlin LiaoCollege of Food Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aim: The aroma-producing strain of Methods: Mutants were obtained by space breeding. The colony morphology and cell morphology of the mutant strain were identified, the phylogenetic tree of the two strains was constructed, and the whole-genome sequences of the wild strain and the mutant strain were compared. The aroma components and key odor compounds of the two strains were analyzed and compared by HS-SPME-GC-MS and E-nose detection, and the data were processed by using the relative odor activity value (ROAV) analysis method. Results: A mutant strain of

Indexed as

Geotrichum candidumHS-SPME-GC-MSrelative odor activity value (ROAV)space breedingwhole genome sequencing (WGS)

Identifiers

PMID35935228
PMCPMC9354409

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.