ArticleTransplantation direct2022
A Novel Digital Algorithm for Identifying Liver Steatosis Using Smartphone-Captured Images.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optical imaging for screening and early cancer diagnosis in low-resource settings.Nature reviews bioengineering · 2024Article
- Development of a portable device to quantify hepatic steatosis in potential donor livers.Frontiers in transplantation · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Access to lifesaving liver transplantation is limited by a severe organ shortage. One factor contributing to the shortage is the high rate of discard in livers with histologic steatosis. Livers with <30% macrosteatosis are generally considered safe for transplant. However, histologic assessment of steatosis by a pathologist remains subjective and is often limited by image quality. Here, we address this bottleneck by creating an automated digital algorithm for calculating histologic steatosis using only images of liver biopsy histology obtained with a smartphone. Methods: Multiple images of frozen section liver histology slides were captured using a smartphone camera via the optical lens of a simple light microscope. Biopsy samples from 80 patients undergoing liver transplantation were included. An automated digital algorithm was designed to capture and count steatotic droplets in liver tissue while discounting areas of vascular lumen, white space, and processing artifacts. Pathologists of varying experience provided steatosis scores, and results were compared with the algorithm's assessment. Interobserver agreement between pathologists was also assessed. Results: Interobserver agreement between all pathologists was very low but increased with specialist training in liver pathology. A significant linear relationship was found between steatosis estimates of the algorithm compared with expert liver pathologists, though the latter had consistently higher estimates. Conclusions: This study demonstrates proof of the concept that smartphone-captured images can be used in conjunction with a digital algorithm to measure steatosis. Integration of this technology into the transplant workflow may significantly improve organ utilization rates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.