ArticleTransplantation direct2022
The Role of Complement Split-products as Biomarkers for Acute Antibody-mediated Rejection of Kidney Allografts.
Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acute antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is mediated by the activation of the classical complement system in addition to noncomplement-dependent inflammatory pathways. Complement fixation by donor-specific antibodies leads to cleavage of the complement proteins C4, C3, and C5 to produce multiple complement split-products (CSP) and the end-effector membrane attack complex, C5b-9. In this study, we investigate CSP as potential biomarkers for AMR. Methods: In an Institutional Review Board-approved, prospective, controlled study, CSP levels were measured in blood and urine samples from consecutive kidney transplant recipients with biopsy-proven AMR (n = 10), acute cellular rejection (ACR) (n = 5), or no rejection (n = 5). After obtaining informed consent, samples were collected at the time of biopsy (day 0) and days 15 (end of rejection treatment) and 30 postbiopsy for AMR and ACR patients. ELISA was used to measure C5a, C4d, and soluble C5b-9 concentrations in blood and urine, in addition to factor Bb (Bb) concentration in blood only. Kidney transplant histopathology was evaluated using the Banff 2013 classification. Rejection treatment and follow-up were performed per standard of care. Results: Blood and urine CSP levels adjusted to urine creatinine were not elevated in AMR compared to no rejection and ACR arms. There was significant variability in CSP concentration within each of the study groups. Conclusion: Our study does not support the utility of CSP as surrogate biomarkers of AMR; however, it is limited by the small sample size and larger studies may be warranted.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.