Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35935023›Full record

ArticleTransplantation direct2022

Predictive Models for Recurrent Membranous Nephropathy After Kidney Transplantation.

Edmund Y M Chung, Katrina Blazek, Armando Teixeira-Pinto, Ankit Sharma, Siah Kim, Yingxin Lin, Karen Keung, Bhadran Bose, Lukas Kairaitis, Hugh McCarthy and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Transplantation direct, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 7 institutions in 2 countries.

Edmund Y M ChungCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Katrina BlazekSchool of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Kensington, NSW, Australia.
Armando Teixeira-PintoSchool of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Ankit SharmaCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Siah KimCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Yingxin LinSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia.
Karen KeungDepartment of Renal Medicine, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW, Australia.
Bhadran BoseDepartment of Renal Medicine, Nepean Hospital, Kingswood, NSW, Australia.
Lukas KairaitisDepartment of Renal Medicine, Blacktown Hospital, Blacktown, NSW, Australia.
Hugh McCarthyCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Pierre RoncoSorbonne Université, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris, France.
Stephen I AlexanderCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Germaine WongCentre for Kidney Research, The Children's Hospital at Westmead, Westmead, NSW, Australia.
Children's Hospital at Westmead · AUThe University of Sydney · AUBlacktown & Mount Druitt Hospital · AUInserm · FRNepean Hospital · AUUNSW Sydney · AUWestmead Hospital · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent membranous nephropathy (MN) posttransplantation affects 35% to 50% of kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) and accounts for 50% allograft loss 5 y after diagnosis. Predictive factors for recurrent MN may include HLA-D risk alleles, but other factors have not been explored with certainty. Methods: The Australian and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant registry was used to develop 3 prediction models for recurrent MN (Group Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator [LASSO], penalized Cox regression, and random forest), which were tuned using tenfold cross-validation in a derivation cohort with complete HLA data. KTRs with MN but incomplete HLA data formed the validation cohort. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC). Results: One hundred ninety-nine KTRs with MN were included, and 25 (13%) had recurrent MN (median follow-up 5.9 y). The AUC-ROCs for Group LASSO, penalized Cox regression, and random forest models were 0.85 (95% confidence interval, 0.76-0.94), 0.91 (0.85-0.96), and 0.62 (0.57-0.69), respectively, in the derivation cohort, with moderate agreement in selected variables between the models (55%-70%). In their validation cohorts, the AUC-ROCs for Group LASSO and penalized Cox regression were 0.60 (0.49-0.70) and 0.73 (0.59-0.86), respectively. Variables of importance chosen by all models included recipient HLA-A2, donor HLA-DR12, donor-recipient HLA-B65, and HLA-DR12 match. Conclusions: A penalized Cox regression performed reasonably for predicting recurrent MN and was superior to Group LASSO and random forest models. These models highlighted the importance of donor-recipient HLA characteristics to recurrent MN, although validation in larger datasets is required.

Identifiers

PMID35935023
PMCPMC9355108
OpenAlexW4290720599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.