Observational studyAdvances in therapy2022
Clinical Value of TCCD for Evaluating the Prognosis of Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury After Large Decompressive Craniectomy: A Retrospective Study.
Observational study in Advances in therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- TCD-Guided management in carotid endarterectomy: a retrospective study.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIt is challenging to assess the prognosis of patients with severe traumatic brain injury (sTBI) after large decompressive craniectomy (DC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical value of transcranial color-coded duplex sonography (TCCD) for assessing the prognosis of sTBI patients 6 months after large DC.
methodsThis was a retrospective observational study that consecutively enrolled 84 patients with sTBI who were followed up for prognosis until 6 months after large DC. The primary endpoint was the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). According to the GOS, patients were divided into an unfavorable prognosis group (GOS 1-3, n = 47) and a favorable prognosis group (GOS 4-5, n = 37).
resultsSignificant between-group differences were found in age and hemodynamic parameters (systolic peak blood flow velocity, end-diastolic blood flow velocity, mean blood flow velocity, pulsatility index and resistance index) of the middle cerebral artery detected by TCCD (P < 0.05 for all). Subsequently, ridge regression was used to build a prognostic model for patients with large DC. Based on the cerebral hemodynamic parameters measured by TCCD and age, the mean (± standard deviation) area under the curve of the prognostic model in patients with sTBI after large DC was 0.76 ± 0.22. The sensitivity and specificity were 82.08% and 74.17%, respectively.
conclusionsThe cerebral hemodynamic parameters detected by TCCD, combined with age, may be used to predict the outcomes of patients with sTBI at 6 months after large DC. As a noninvasive method, TCCD has the potential to assess the prognosis of these patients.
trial registrationChiCTR: ChiCTR1800019758. Registered 27 November 2018-retrospectively registered ( http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx ).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.