Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35934721›Full record

ArticleEuropean radiology experimental2022

Radiologic-pathologic correlation in breast cancer: do MRI biomarkers correlate with pathologic features and molecular subtypes?

Francesca Galati, Veronica Rizzo, Giuliana Moffa, Claudia Caramanico, Endi Kripa, Bruna Cerbelli, Giulia D'Amati, Federica Pediconi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European radiology experimental, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca GalatiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Veronica RizzoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy. veronica.rizzo@uniroma1.it.ORCID 0000-0003-1781-3174
Giuliana MoffaDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Claudia CaramanicoDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Endi KripaDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Bruna CerbelliDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Giulia D'AmatiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Federica PediconiDepartment of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, 00161, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBreast cancer (BC) includes different pathological and molecular subtypes. This study aimed to investigate whether multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) could reliably predict the molecular status of BC, comparing mpMRI features with pathological and immunohistochemical results.

methodsThis retrospective study included 156 patients with an ultrasound-guided biopsy-proven BC, who underwent breast mpMRI (including diffusion-weighted imaging) on a 3-T scanner from 2017 to 2020. Histopathological analyses were performed on the surgical specimens. Kolmogorov-Smirnov Z, χ

resultsFifteen patients were affected with ductal carcinoma in situ, 122 by invasive carcinoma of no special type, and 19 with invasive lobular carcinoma. Out of a total of 141 invasive cancers, 45 were luminal A-like, 54 luminal B-like, 5 human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) positive, and 37 triple negative. The regression analyses showed that size < 2 cm predicted luminal A-like status (p = 0.025), while rim enhancement (p < 0.001), intralesional necrosis (p = 0.001), peritumoural oedema (p < 0.001), and axillary adenopathies (p = 0.012) were negative predictors. Oppositely, round shape (p = 0.001), rim enhancement (p < 0.001), intralesional necrosis (p < 0.001), and peritumoural oedema (p < 0.001) predicted triple-negative status.

conclusionsmpMRI has been confirmed to be a valid noninvasive predictor of BC subtypes, especially luminal A and triple negative. Considering the central role of pathology in BC diagnosis and immunohistochemical profiling in the current precision medicine era, a detailed radiologic-pathologic correlation seems vital to properly evaluate BC.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsBreastFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingNecrosisRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersBreast neoplasmsMultiparametric magnetic resonance imagingPathology (molecular)Precision medicine

Identifiers

PMID35934721
PMCPMC9357588
OpenAlexW4290471548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.