Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35934011›Full record

ReviewObesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity2022

Effective strategies in ending weight stigma in healthcare.

Britta Talumaa, Adrian Brown, Rachel L Batterham, Anastasia Z Kalea

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06348238 (Strategies to Improve Well-Being and Diabetes Management), which is not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 6 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 6 pooled it
70.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06348238 naactive not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Strategies to Improve Well-Being and Diabetes Management

TypeinterventionalSponsorElizabeth ScharnetzkiRan2024 to 2027Enrolled150ConditionsDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2ArmsSelf-Affirmation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 6 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 215 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Do Individuals With Overweight and Obesity Have Reduced Affective and Cognitive Empathy? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Structural weight stigma in healthcare toward preconception, pregnant, and postpartum women: A systematic review.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  4. Weight stigma in the preconception, pregnancy, and postpartum periods: A systematic review of women's perspectives.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Efficacy of interventions aimed at reducing explicit and implicit weight bias in healthcare students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Weight discrimination and metabolic syndrome: Examining discrimination attributions and frequency across settings.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2026
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Reconceptualizing the ethics of diagnosis: a Foucauldian framework.Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM · 2026
    Article

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Britta TalumaaDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.
Adrian BrownDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1818-6192
Rachel L BatterhamDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5477-8585
Anastasia Z KaleaDivision of Medicine, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-5775-3984
University College Hospital · GBUniversity College London · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-2015-06-005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Weight stigma impacts negatively healthcare quality and hinders public health goals. The aim of this review was to identify strategies for minimizing weight bias among healthcare professionals and explore future research directions. An electronic search was performed in PubMed, PsycINFO and Scopus (until June 2020). Studies on weight stigma reduction in healthcare students, trainees and professionals were assessed based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria. A narrative synthesis was undertaken to analyze emerging themes. We identified five stigma reduction strategies in healthcare: (i) increased education, (ii) causal information and controllability, (iii) empathy evoking, (iv) weight-inclusive approach, and (v) mixed methodology. Weight stigma needs to be addressed early on and continuously throughout healthcare education and practice, by teaching the genetic and socioenvironmental determinants of weight, and explicitly discussing the sources, impact and implications of stigma. There is a need to move away from a solely weight-centric approach to healthcare to a health-focused weight-inclusive one. Assessing the effects of weight stigma in epidemiological research is equally important. The ethical argument and evidence base for the need to reduce weight stigma in healthcare and beyond is strong. Although evidence on long-term stigma reduction is emerging, precautionary action is needed.

Indexed as

Weight PrejudiceDelivery of Health CareHealth PersonnelHumansSocial StigmaStudentshealthcare professionalsobesity stigmaweight bias

Identifiers

PMID35934011
PMCPMC9540781
OpenAlexW4290459844

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.