Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35933678›Full record

ReviewThe Permanente journal2022

Behavioral Weight Loss and Maintenance: A 25-Year Research Program Informing Innovative Programming.

James J Annesi

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in The Permanente journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.

James J AnnesiUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.
University of Alabama at Birmingham · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction Behavioral interventions targeting sustained weight loss have largely failed for decades, with little chance of improvement using prevailing methods. Objective To address treatment limitations, a focused 25-year research program was reviewed through the lens of social cognitive theory, probative investigations, and original predictive models. Innovative, but evidence-based, treatment suggestions were sought. Results Task 1 of the research program addressed adherence to exercise, a well-established requirement for maintained weight loss. A culminating model addressing this treatment aspect suggested that interrelations among changes in self-regulatory skills usage, self-efficacy, and mood should guide exercise-support programming. Task 2 attached an eating-behavior change component and probed for malleable psychosocial variables predictive of success over the weight-loss phase (initial 6 months after treatment initiation). After thorough evaluation of selected theory- and research-driven psychosocial variables, changes in self-regulation, self-efficacy, and mood were again deemed to be the most salient predictors driving eating change. In Task 3, treatment foci related to changes in the 3 psychosocial variables were supported into the weight-loss maintenance phase (beyond 6 months), and the carry-over of changes in self-regulation and self-efficacy from exercise- to eating-related contexts was identified and leveraged. Task 4 suggested value in additionally addressing emotional eating as a distinct factor. Conclusion Suggestions informing principles and extensions of a treatment approach previously demonstrating atypically high degrees of success with maintaining weight loss in field- and community-based settings are provided. Those methods emanate from the reviewed research program, which shaped novel procedures to leverage exercise-induced psychosocial changes for their carry-over benefits for controlling eating.

Indexed as

EatingObesityFeeding BehaviorHumansSelf EfficacyWeight LossCognitive-BehavioralExerciseObesitySelf-RegulationTreatmentWeight Loss

Identifiers

PMID35933678
PMCPMC9662257
OpenAlexW4283169470

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.