ArticleThe Permanente journal2022
Improving Cervical Cancer Screening Rates at an Urban Federally Qualified Health Center Family Medicine Residency Clinic.
Article in The Permanente journal, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring diverse applications of team-based care in preventive medicine: a scoping review.BMC primary care · 2026Article
- Increasing Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Black Men in Virginia: Development of an mHealth Intervention.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Implementing self-collection for primary human papillomavirus testing: Perspectives on implications for federally qualified health center patient populations.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Family medicine residency clinics and underserved Federally Qualified Health Center clinics often have lower rates of cervical cancer screening (CCS). Methods A series of resident-run, team-based quality improvement projects were conducted to iteratively improve CCS rates in an urban Federally Qualified Health Center in a high-need and high-demand region. Results The authors were able to improve CCS rates from 52.2% to 66.3% through 6 quality improvement projects. Conclusion Improving the clinical workflows and systems to promote better rates of CCS likely requires a series of changes, however, promoting CCS in the usual clinic workflow, regardless of the reason for visit, demonstrated the greatest gains in CCS in our setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.