Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35933632›Full record

ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2023

Practice patterns in transoral robotic surgery: results of an American head and neck society survey.

Andrew J Holcomb, Rachael Kammer, Allison Holman, Tessa Goldsmith, Vasu Divi, Heather M Starmer, Joseph Zenga, Ryan Li, Urjeet A Patel, Jeremy D Richmon

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew J HolcombDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA. Andrew.holcomb@nmhs.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8397-2312
Rachael KammerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Allison HolmanDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Tessa GoldsmithDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Vasu DiviDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Heather M StarmerDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Joseph ZengaDepartment of Otolaryngology and Communication Sciences, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Ryan LiDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA.
Urjeet A PatelDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jeremy D RichmonDepartment of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, MA, USA.
Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary · USStanford University · USMedical College of Wisconsin · USNorthwestern University · USOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To understand perioperative practices for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) among academic medical centers. An electronic cross-sectional survey was distributed to fellows and program directors participating in 49 American Head and Neck Society fellowships. Operative decisions, medical and swallowing management, and disposition planning were assessed. Thirty-eight responses were collected (77.6%). Twenty-three centers (60.5%) performed > 25 cases annually with the remainder performing fewer. The da Vinci Si was the most commonly used platform (n = 28, 73.7%). A majority of institutions advocated tailored resection to adequate margins (n = 27, 71.1%) over fixed subunit-based resection (n = 11, 28.9%). Most surgeons (n = 29, 76.3%) performed neck dissection concurrent with TORS, and 89.5% (n = 34) routinely ligated external carotid artery branches. A minority of institutions (n = 17, 45.9%) endorsed a standardized TORS care pathway. Antibiotic choices and duration varied, the most common choice being ampicillin/sulbactam (n = 21, 55.3%), and the most common duration being 24 h or less (n = 22, 57.9%). Multimodal analgesia was used at 36 centers (94.7%), steroids at 31 centers (81.6%), and pharmacologic venous thromboembolic prophylaxis at 29 centers (76.3%). Nasogastric feeding tubes were placed during surgery at 20 institutions (54.1%). Speech-language pathologists routinely performed postoperative swallow evaluations at 29 (78.4%) sites. Practice patterns are variable among institutions performing TORS. While certain surgical and postoperative practices were quite common, many institutions reported no standard TORS care pathway. Further understanding of the impact of individual practices on outcomes is necessary to develop evidence-based perioperative protocols for TORS.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsRobotic Surgical ProceduresCross-Sectional StudiesHeadHumansNeck DissectionUnited StatesEnhanced recovery after surgeryHead and neck cancerOropharynx cancerTransoral robotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID35933632
OpenAlexW4290378829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.