ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022
Infusion-related side-effects during convection enhanced delivery for brainstem-diffuse midline glioma/diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Protocols and safety profile of convection enhanced delivery in pediatric patients: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026Pooled it
- Adjuvant convection-enhanced delivery for the treatment of brain tumors.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2024Review
- Decoding Diffuse Midline Gliomas: A Comprehensive Review of Pathogenesis, Diagnosis and Treatment.Cancers · 2023Review
- Emerging Therapeutic Strategies for Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma: A Systematic Review.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionSide-effects during convection enhanced delivery (CED) are poorly understood. We intended to determine the frequency of side-effects during brain stem infusion and determine risk factors for side-effects persisting longer than 24 h.
methodsChildren with a radiological diagnosis of brain stem diffuse midline glioma/Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma were treated on compassionate grounds with awake infusion of carboplatin and sodium valproate into the brain stem using the 4-catheter (2 trans-cerebellar 2 trans-frontal) chronic, intermittent Renishaw Drug Delivery System. We used change in the Pontine Neurological Observation Score (PONScore), a standardised neurological assessment tool, to identify side-effects during infusion. Recovery was determined by retrospective chart review.
results55 infusions were performed in 8 children (3-11 years). Mean PONScore increased during infusion from 3.3 to 5.7 (p-value > 0.001). One hundred and fifty-seven infusion-related side-effects were identified including headache (33/157) and limb weakness (49/157). Fifty-four side-effects persisted > 24 h. Side-effects that had occurred during a previous infusion and those that occurred during infusion via trans-cerebellar catheters were more likely to be persistent with OR 2.333 (95% CI 1.094-4.976; p-value = 0.028) and 2.155 (1.029-4.513; p-value = 0.042) respectively. If infusion was stopped or titrated at onset rather than continued, the side-effect was less likely to persist > 24 h, OR 0.473 (95% CI 0.177-0.948; p-value = 0.037). Most side-effects developed within the first three millilitre of infusion.
conclusionsSide-effects during brainstem infusion are common, can be transient or persist longer than 24 h. Neurological injury during infusion may be time dependent and accumulative rather than volume dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.