Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35933568›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2022

Infusion-related side-effects during convection enhanced delivery for brainstem-diffuse midline glioma/diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma.

Milo Hollingworth, Stergios Zacharoulis

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Protocols and safety profile of convection enhanced delivery in pediatric patients: a systematic review.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Milo HollingworthDepartment of Neurosurgery, Queens Medical Centre, Nottingham University Hospital NHS Trust, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, UK. milo.hollingworth@nottingham.ac.uk.
Stergios ZacharoulisPaediatric Haemato-Oncology, CUMC/Herbert Irving Pavilion, New York, NY, 10032, USA.
Queen's Medical Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSide-effects during convection enhanced delivery (CED) are poorly understood. We intended to determine the frequency of side-effects during brain stem infusion and determine risk factors for side-effects persisting longer than 24 h.

methodsChildren with a radiological diagnosis of brain stem diffuse midline glioma/Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma were treated on compassionate grounds with awake infusion of carboplatin and sodium valproate into the brain stem using the 4-catheter (2 trans-cerebellar 2 trans-frontal) chronic, intermittent Renishaw Drug Delivery System. We used change in the Pontine Neurological Observation Score (PONScore), a standardised neurological assessment tool, to identify side-effects during infusion. Recovery was determined by retrospective chart review.

results55 infusions were performed in 8 children (3-11 years). Mean PONScore increased during infusion from 3.3 to 5.7 (p-value > 0.001). One hundred and fifty-seven infusion-related side-effects were identified including headache (33/157) and limb weakness (49/157). Fifty-four side-effects persisted > 24 h. Side-effects that had occurred during a previous infusion and those that occurred during infusion via trans-cerebellar catheters were more likely to be persistent with OR 2.333 (95% CI 1.094-4.976; p-value = 0.028) and 2.155 (1.029-4.513; p-value = 0.042) respectively. If infusion was stopped or titrated at onset rather than continued, the side-effect was less likely to persist > 24 h, OR 0.473 (95% CI 0.177-0.948; p-value = 0.037). Most side-effects developed within the first three millilitre of infusion.

conclusionsSide-effects during brainstem infusion are common, can be transient or persist longer than 24 h. Neurological injury during infusion may be time dependent and accumulative rather than volume dependent.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsBrain Stem NeoplasmsDiffuse Intrinsic Pontine GliomaGliomaChildConvectionDrug Delivery SystemsHumansRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic AgentsClinical ScalesConvection Enhanced DeliveryDIPGMidline Diffuse GliomaNeurological Assessment

Identifiers

PMID35933568
PMCPMC9424151
OpenAlexW4290059123

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.