Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35933161›Full record

ArticleMetallomics : integrated biometal science2022

Metalation calculators for E. coli strain JM109 (DE3): aerobic, anaerobic, and hydrogen peroxide exposed cells cultured in LB media.

Andrew W Foster, Sophie E Clough, Zeynep Aki, Tessa R Young, Alison R Clarke, Nigel J Robinson

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Metallomics : integrated biometal science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Microbial metal physiology: ions to ecosystems.Nature reviews. Microbiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. A Pharmacodynamic Study of Aminoglycosides against PathogenicPharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. The molecular mechanisms of the bacterial iron sensor IdeR.Biochemical Society transactions · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew W FosterDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Sophie E CloughDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Zeynep AkiAdvanced Research Computing, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Tessa R YoungDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Alison R ClarkeAdvanced Research Computing, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Nigel J RobinsonDepartment of Biosciences, Durham University, Durham, UK.
Durham University · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/R002118/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S009787/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/S014020/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/V006002/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/W015749/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Three Web-based calculators, and three analogous spreadsheets, have been generated that predict in vivo metal occupancies of proteins based on known metal affinities. The calculations exploit estimates of the availabilities of the labile buffered pools of different metals inside a cell. Here, metal availabilities have been estimated for a strain of Escherichia coli that is commonly used in molecular biology and biochemistry research, e.g. in the production of recombinant proteins. Metal availabilities have been examined for cells grown in Luria-Bertani (LB) medium aerobically, anaerobically, and in response to H2O2 by monitoring the abundance of a selected set of metal-responsive transcripts by quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR). The selected genes are regulated by DNA-binding metal sensors that have been thermodynamically characterized in related bacterial cells enabling gene expression to be read out as a function of intracellular metal availabilities expressed as free energies for forming metal complexes. The calculators compare these values with the free energies for forming complexes with the protein of interest, derived from metal affinities, to estimate how effectively the protein can compete with exchangeable binding sites in the intracellular milieu. The calculators then inter-compete the different metals, limiting total occupancy of the site to a maximum stoichiometry of 1, to output percentage occupancies with each metal. In addition to making these new and conditional calculators available, an original purpose of this article was to provide a tutorial that discusses constraints of this approach and presents ways in which such calculators might be exploited in basic and applied research, and in next-generation manufacturing.

Indexed as

Escherichia coliHydrogen PeroxideAnaerobiosisMetalsRecombinant ProteinsHydrogen PeroxideMetalsRecombinant Proteinsindustrial biotechnologymetal availabilitymetal bindingmetal speciationmetal specificityprotein expression

Identifiers

PMID35933161
PMCPMC9434800
OpenAlexW4290188380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.