Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35933103›Full record

ReviewActa biomaterialia2022

In-vitro models of biocompatibility testing for restorative dental materials: From 2D cultures to organs on-a-chip.

Cristiane Miranda Franca, Gabriela de Souza Balbinot, Diana Cunha, Vicente de Paulo Aragão Saboia, Jack Ferracane, Luiz E Bertassoni

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Hybrid TiONature communications · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Mutanobactin-D, aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cristiane Miranda FrancaDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Gabriela de Souza BalbinotDental Materials Laboratory, School of Dentistry, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.
Diana CunhaPost-Graduation Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Vicente de Paulo Aragão SaboiaPost-Graduation Program in Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.
Jack FerracaneDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States.
Luiz E BertassoniDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Center for Regenerative Medicine, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, United States; Cancer Early Detection Advanced Research Center (CEDAR), Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR, United States. Electronic address: bertasso@ohsu.edu.

Funding

Oregon Clinical and Translational Research Institute - The National COVID Cohort Collaborative (N3C)UL1TR002369 · NCATS · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI Cynthia D Morris, Christopher G. Slatore · 2017 to 2026
$78.4M
Microengineering vascularized and innervated bone-like scaffolds as an alternative to autologous bone graftsR01DE029553 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTASSONI, LUIZ EDUARDO · 2021 to 2025
$3.0M
Microengineering the Dental Pulp Vascular Microenvironment_Diversity SupplementR01DE026170 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTASSONI, LUIZ EDUARDO · 2016 to 2020
$2.5M
Engineering Immunomodulatory Scaffolds for Dental Pulp RegenerationK01DE030484 · NIDCR · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI MIRANDA FRANCA, CRISTIANE · 2022 to 2024
$464k
An organ-on-a-chip model system to study prostate cancer metastasis into vascularized boneR21CA263860 · NCI · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI BERTASSONI, LUIZ EDUARDO, MORAN, AMY E · 2022 to 2023
$392k
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR002369NIDCR NIH HHS K01 DE030484NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE026170NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE029553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dental caries is a biofilm-mediated, diet-modulated, multifactorial and dynamic disease that affects more than 90% of adults in Western countries. The current treatment for decayed tissue is based on using materials to replace the lost enamel or dentin. More than 500 million dental restorations are placed annually worldwide, and materials used for these purposes either directly or indirectly interact with dentin and pulp tissues. The development and understanding of the effects of restorative dental materials are based on different in-vitro and in-vivo tests, which have been evolving with time. In this review, we first discuss the characteristics of the tooth and the dentin-pulp interface that are unique for materials testing. Subsequently, we discuss frequently used in-vitro tests to evaluate the biocompatibility of dental materials commonly used for restorative procedures. Finally, we present our perspective on the future directions for biological research on dental materials using tissue engineering and organs on-a-chip approaches. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Dental caries is still the most prevalent infectious disease globally, requiring more than 500 million restorations to be placed every year. Regrettably, the failure rates of such restorations are still high. Those rates are partially based on the fact that current platforms to test dental materials are somewhat inaccurate in reproducing critical components of the complex oral microenvironment. Thus, there is a collective effort to develop new materials while evolving the platforms to test them. In this context, the present review critically discusses in-vitro models used to evaluate the biocompatibility of restorative dental materials and brings a perspective on future directions for tissue-engineered and organs-on-a-chip platforms for testing new dental materials.

Indexed as

Dental CariesDentinAdultComposite ResinsDental MaterialsDental Restoration, PermanentHumansLab-On-A-Chip DevicesMaterials TestingComposite ResinsDental MaterialsBiocompatibilityCell cultureDental materialsTissue chips

Identifiers

PMID35933103
PMCPMC9814917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.