ReviewActa biomaterialia2022
In-vitro models of biocompatibility testing for restorative dental materials: From 2D cultures to organs on-a-chip.
Review in Acta biomaterialia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
33 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical performance of single shade universal resin composites: a randomized controlled one year follow-up study.BMC oral health · 2025Trial
- Biological effects of a premixed calcium silicate pulp-capping material containing dimethyl sulphoxide as a vehicle: In vitro and in vivo study.European journal of oral sciences · 2026Article
- Evaluation of the Cytotoxic Effects of Adhesive Systems with Different pH Values on L929 Fibroblast Cells: An In Vitro Study.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Cytotoxicity of Root Canal Sealers and Potential Clinical Implications: A Comprehensive Systematic Review of In Vitro Studies.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- An Innovative "Tooth-On-Chip" Microfluidic Device Emulating the Structure and Physiology of the Dental Pulp Tissue.Advanced healthcare materials · 2026Article
- Nanoscale Approaches to Oro-Dental Tissue Engineering: A Review of Strategies, Composites, and Translational Challenges.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- In vitro assessment of cytotoxic, genotoxic, and antimicrobial properties of pediatric restorative dental materials.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Evaluation of the total antioxidant capacity and cytotoxicity of single shade universal resin composites.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Hybrid TiONature communications · 2025Article
- Oral tissue spheroid, organoid, and organ-on chip microphysiological modeling strategies towards enhanced emulation of health and disease.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2025Review
- Evaluation of the accuracy, occlusal contact and clinical applications of zirconia crowns using artificial intelligence design versus human design.Journal of dental sciences · 2025Article
- Bioimplant-on-a-Chip for Facile Investigation of Periodontal Ligament Formation on Biogenic Hydroxyapatite/TiACS applied materials & interfaces · 2025Article
- Review
- Guidance for evaluating biomaterials' properties and biological potential for dental pulp tissue engineering and regeneration research.Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials · 2025Review
- Advances in modeling periodontal host-microbe interactions: insights from organotypic and organ-on-chip systems.Lab on a chip · 2025Review
- Mutanobactin-D, aInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Self-healing dental biomaterials: bioinspired pathways to sustainable dentistry.Biomaterial investigations in dentistry · 2025Review
- Using the Immune System for Effective Periodontal and Caries Management.BioMed research international · 2025Review
- Antibacterial resorbable barrier membranes with therapeutic activity for guided tissue regeneration.Brazilian oral research · 2025Article
- Development of an Oral Epithelial Ex Vivo Organ Culture Model for Biocompatibility and Permeability Assessment of Biomaterials.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dental caries is a biofilm-mediated, diet-modulated, multifactorial and dynamic disease that affects more than 90% of adults in Western countries. The current treatment for decayed tissue is based on using materials to replace the lost enamel or dentin. More than 500 million dental restorations are placed annually worldwide, and materials used for these purposes either directly or indirectly interact with dentin and pulp tissues. The development and understanding of the effects of restorative dental materials are based on different in-vitro and in-vivo tests, which have been evolving with time. In this review, we first discuss the characteristics of the tooth and the dentin-pulp interface that are unique for materials testing. Subsequently, we discuss frequently used in-vitro tests to evaluate the biocompatibility of dental materials commonly used for restorative procedures. Finally, we present our perspective on the future directions for biological research on dental materials using tissue engineering and organs on-a-chip approaches. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Dental caries is still the most prevalent infectious disease globally, requiring more than 500 million restorations to be placed every year. Regrettably, the failure rates of such restorations are still high. Those rates are partially based on the fact that current platforms to test dental materials are somewhat inaccurate in reproducing critical components of the complex oral microenvironment. Thus, there is a collective effort to develop new materials while evolving the platforms to test them. In this context, the present review critically discusses in-vitro models used to evaluate the biocompatibility of restorative dental materials and brings a perspective on future directions for tissue-engineered and organs-on-a-chip platforms for testing new dental materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.