Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35933003›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine2022

Reimagining public safety: Public opinion on police reform and gun violence prevention by race and gun ownership in the United States.

Julie A Ward, Emma E McGinty, Talib Hudson, Elizabeth M Stone, Colleen L Barry, Daniel W Webster, Cassandra K Crifasi

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Gun-Related Beliefs as Predictors of Gun Policy Support: Findings from the Nationally Representative GRIP Survey.Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research · 2026
    Article
  4. Observational
  5. Article
  6. Differences in Perceptions of Gun-Related Safety by Race and Gun Ownership in the United States.The Journal of law, medicine & ethics : a journal of the American Society of Law, Medicine & Ethics · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Julie A WardDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jward52@jhu.edu.
Emma E McGintyDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Talib HudsonDepartment of Public and Urban Policy, The New School Milano School of Policy, Management, and Environment, New York, NY, USA.
Elizabeth M StoneDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Colleen L BarryCornell Jeb E. Brooks School of Public Policy, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Daniel W WebsterDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Cassandra K CrifasiDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johns Hopkins University · USCornell University · US

Funding

Interdisciplinary Research Training in Trauma and Violence (IRTTV)T32HD094687 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI BELCHER, HAROLYN MILLICENT EDITH, CAMPBELL, JACQUELYN CUTLER · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
Mental Health Services and Systems Training ProgramT32MH109436 · NIMH · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Matthew Eisenberg, Elizabeth A. Stuart · 2017 to 2026
$1.7M
A comparison of firearm-related intimate partner homicide in Texas and Maryland: Prevalence, identification of those at risk, and the effect of firearm regulationsR61HD104570 · NICHD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI CAMPBELL, JACQUELYN CUTLER, MESSING, JILL T · 2020 to 2020
$1.1M
NICHD NIH HHS R61 HD104570NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD094687NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH109436
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inequitable experiences of community gun violence and victimization by police use of force led to nationwide calls to "reimagine public safety" in 2020. In January 2021, we examined public support among U.S. adults for 7 policy approaches to reforming policing and investing in community gun violence prevention. Using a nationally representative sample (N = 2778), with oversampling for Black Americans, Hispanic Americans, and gun owners, we assessed support overall and by racial, ethnic, and gun owner subgroups. Overall, we found majority support for funding and implementing police and mental health co-responder models (66% and 76%, respectively), diversion from incarceration for people with symptoms of mental illness (72%), stronger laws to assure police accountability (72%), and funding for community-based and hospital-based gun violence prevention programs (69% and 60%, respectively). Support for redirecting funding from the police to social services was more variable (44% overall; White: 35%, Black: 60%, Hispanic: 43%). For all survey items, support was strongest among Black Americans. Gun owners overall reported lower support for public safety reforms and investments than respondents who did not own guns, but this distinction was found to be driven by White gun owners. The views of Black gun owners were indistinguishable from Black non-owners and were similar to White non-owners on most issues. These findings suggest that broad public support exists for innovative violence reduction strategies and public safety reforms.

Indexed as

FirearmsGun ViolenceAdultHumansOwnershipPolicePublic OpinionUnited StatesViolenceGun violencePolice reformPublic opinionPublic safety

Identifiers

PMID35933003
PMCPMC9722519
OpenAlexW4289731932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.