Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932960›Full record

ArticlePhotodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy2022

Sandpaper curettage: A simple method to improve PDT outcomes for actinic keratosis.

Lauren E Heusinkveld, Taylor A Bullock, Jeffrey Negrey, Christine B Warren, Edward V Maytin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Photodiagnosis and photodynamic therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03319251 (Biomarkers of Clinical Responsiveness to Photodynamic Therapy), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03319251 completednot on this map

Biomarkers of Clinical Responsiveness to Photodynamic Therapy

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorThe Cleveland ClinicRan2017 to 2023Enrolled137ConditionsActinic Keratosis
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Lauren E HeusinkveldCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, United States.
Taylor A BullockCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, United States; Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland 44195, United States.
Jeffrey NegreyLerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland 44195, United States.
Christine B WarrenCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, United States; Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland 44195, United States.
Edward V MaytinCleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, United States; Department of Dermatology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland 44195, United States; Lerner Research Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland 44195, United States. Electronic address: maytine@ccf.org.
Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine · USCase Western Reserve University · USCleveland Clinic · US

Funding

Small Molecule Enhancers of Photodynamic Therapy for Skin CancerP01CA084203 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI Bryan Quilty Spring · 2001 to 2026
$27.9M
Vitamin D and Photodynamic Therapy for Human Skin Cancer (SCC and BCC)R01CA204158 · NCI · CLEVELAND CLINIC LERNER COM-CWRU · PI MAYTIN, EDWARD V · 2017 to 2022
$2.3M
NCI NIH HHS P01 CA084203NCI NIH HHS R01 CA204158
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPhotodynamic therapy (PDT) is a non-scarring, repeatable, and safe treatment for actinic keratosis (AK), but improvements in efficacy are still needed.

backgroundDevices such as steel blades, needle rollers, and lasers are currently used to remove hypertrophic stratum corneum on AKs to improve PDT outcomes. However, curettage with fine sandpaper could be a gentler, effective alternative.

methodsA retrospective study was designed to compare PDT with or without sandpaper curettage. Patients were selected from a database registry of patients with face and scalp AKs (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03319251). Patients in Group 1 underwent PDT alone (20% ALA, 15 min; blue light 417 nm, 30 min). Patients in Group 2 were pretreated with gentle sandpaper curettage prior to ALA and illumination. The two groups were compared using multivariate matching, normalizing for age, sex, initial AK counts, and time to follow-up.

resultsSixty-six patients were selected for matching analysis (n=38, PDT only; n=28, PDT+curettage). Demographics between the groups were similar (mean ± SD), including age (71.0 ± 8.3 vs. 71.0 ± 8.0 years), baseline AK count (53 ± 39 vs. 44± 32), and time to post-PDT follow-up (111 ± 28 vs. 113 ± 32 days). At follow-up, patients who received curettage showed an overall 55% improvement in scalp AK clearance compared to patients who did not receive curettage, adjusting for sex, age, time to follow-up, and baseline AK count (p = 0.0322, multivariable linear regression). DISCUSSION: Sandpaper curettage before PDT treatment is an easy and inexpensive method to significantly improve AK clearance rates.

Indexed as

Keratosis, ActinicPhotochemotherapyAgedAminolevulinic AcidClinical Studies as TopicFemaleHumansMalePhotosensitizing AgentsRetrospective StudiesTreatment OutcomeAminolevulinic AcidPhotosensitizing AgentsActinic keratosisCurettagePhotodynamic therapySandpaper curettage

Identifiers

PMID35932960
PMCPMC10353292
OpenAlexW4289528834

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.