Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932433›Full record

ArticlePlanta2022

Role of guard cell- or mesophyll cell-localized phytochromes in stomatal responses to blue, red, and far-red light.

Sarathi M Weraduwage, Melinda K Frame, Thomas D Sharkey

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Planta, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarathi M WeraduwageMSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0591-4210
Melinda K FrameCenter for Advanced Microscopy, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Thomas D SharkeyMSU-DOE Plant Research Laboratory, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. tsharkey@msu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4423-3223
Bishop's University · CAMichigan State University · US

Funding

Basic Energy Sciences DE-FG02-91ER 20021
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

MAIN

conclusionGuard cell- or mesophyll cell-localized phytochromes do not have a predominant direct light sensory role in red- or blue-light-mediated stomatal opening or far-red-light-mediated stomatal closure of Arabidopsis. The role of phytochromes in blue- and red-light-mediated stomatal opening, and far-red-light- mediated decrease in opening, is still under debate. It is not clear whether reduced stomatal opening in a phytochrome B (phyB) mutant line, is due to phytochrome acting as a direct photosensor or an indirect growth effect. The exact tissue localization of the phytochrome photoreceptor important for stomatal opening is also not known. We studied differences in stomatal opening in an Arabidopsis phyB mutant, and lines showing mesophyll cell-specific or guard cell-specific inactivation of phytochromes. Stomatal conductance (g

Indexed as

ArabidopsisArabidopsis ProteinsDiuronElectron TransportHerbicidesLightMesophyll CellsPhotosynthesisPhytochromePhytochrome BPlant LeavesPlant StomataArabidopsis ProteinsDiuronHerbicidesPhytochromePhytochrome BMammalian biliverdin IXa reductasePhotoreceptorPhotosynthesisPhytochromeStomatal conductance

Identifiers

PMID35932433
OpenAlexW4290000507

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.