Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932421›Full record

ArticleForensic science, medicine, and pathology2023

Applicability and usefulness of the Declaration of Helsinki for forensic research with human cadavers and remains.

Valentina Scarpulla, Alberto Amadasi, Susi Pelotti, Francesca Ingravallo

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Forensic science, medicine, and pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Valentina ScarpullaDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 49, 40126, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8865-0950
Alberto AmadasiInstitute of Legal Medicine and Forensic Sciences, University Medical Centre Charité, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-8920-6771
Susi PelottiDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 49, 40126, Bologna, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2214-8885
Francesca IngravalloDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Via Irnerio 49, 40126, Bologna, Italy. francesca.ingravallo@unibo.it.ORCID 0000-0002-5194-375X
University of Bologna · ITCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bodies of deceased persons and human remains and their specimens (i.e., organs, bones, tissues, or biological samples) are essential in forensic research but ad hoc worldwide-recognized ethical standards for their use are still lacking. Such standards are needed both to avoid possible unethical practices and to sustain research in the forensic field. Pending consensus within the forensic science community regarding this topic, with this article we aim to stimulate a debate as to the applicability and usefulness of the Declaration of Helsinki in the field of forensic research involving human cadavers and remains. Considering the fundamental differences compared to clinical research involving human beings and the different moral obligations involved, we focus on the risks, burdens, and benefits of research, ethics committee approval, and informed consent requirements. The Declaration of Helsinki framework allows forensic researchers to focus on substantial ethical principles promoting the consistency, integrity, and quality of research. Consensus regarding ethical standards and the adoption of national and supranational laws that clearly regulate the use of human cadavers and remains, including those from autopsies, continues to be of primary importance for the forensic science community.

Indexed as

Body RemainsCadaverForensic PathologyHelsinki DeclarationEthics Committees, ResearchHumansInformed ConsentResearchCadaverEthicsForensic anthropologyForensic medicineLegal medicineRisk assessment

Identifiers

PMID35932421
PMCPMC9362629
OpenAlexW4289977727

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.