Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932380›Full record

ArticleJournal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia2022

Comparative analysis of the molecular subtype landscape in canine and human mammary gland tumors.

Helga Bergholtz, Tonje Lien, Frode Lingaas, Therese Sørlie

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. [Comparative pathology in oncology-Best practice].Pathologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  16. Exploring the One Health Paradigm in Male Breast Cancer.Journal of mammary gland biology and neoplasia · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Helga BergholtzDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-0999-1106
Tonje LienDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-3331-4201
Frode LingaasDepartment of Preclinical Sciences and Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0115-2888
Therese SørlieDepartment of Cancer Genetics, Institute for Cancer Research, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. therese.sorlie@rr-research.no.ORCID 0000-0002-5995-2319
Oslo University Hospital · NONorwegian University of Life Sciences · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancers in humans belong to one of several intrinsic molecular subtypes each with different tumor biology and different clinical impact. Mammary gland tumors in dogs are proposed as a relevant comparative model for human breast cancer; however, it is still unclear whether the intrinsic molecular subtypes have the same significance in dogs and humans. Using publicly available data, we analyzed gene expression and whole-exome sequencing data from 158 canine mammary gland tumors. We performed molecular subtyping using the PAM50 method followed by subtype-specific comparisons of gene expression characteristics, mutation patterns and copy number profiles between canine tumors and human breast tumors from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer cohort (n = 1097). We found that luminal A canine tumors greatly resemble luminal A human tumors both in gene expression characteristics, mutations and copy number profiles. Also, the basal-like canine and human tumors were relatively similar, with low expression of luminal epithelial markers and high expression of genes involved in cell proliferation. There were, however, distinct differences in immune-related gene expression patterns in basal-like tumors between the two species. Characteristic HER2-enriched and luminal B subtypes were not present in the canine cohort, and we found no tumors with high-level ERBB2 amplifications. Benign and malignant canine tumors displayed similar PAM50 subtype characteristics. Our findings indicate that deeper understanding of the different molecular subtypes in canine mammary gland tumors will further improve the value of canines as comparative models for human breast cancer.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammary Glands, HumanMammary Neoplasms, AnimalAnimalsBiomarkers, TumorCohort StudiesDogsFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansBiomarkers, TumorBreast cancerCanine tumor modelsComparative modelsMolecular subtypes

Identifiers

PMID35932380
PMCPMC9433360
OpenAlexW4290065521

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.