ArticleRheumatology and therapy2022
Development and Validation of a Machine Learning-Based Nomogram for Prediction of Ankylosing Spondylitis.
Article in Rheumatology and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine learning prediction of surgical approach and clinical heterogeneity in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2026Article
- Machine and deep learning models for ligament injury recognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging and novel diagnostic techniques.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- Harnessing the machine learning and nomogram models: elevating prognostication in nonmetastatic gastric cancer with "double invasion" for personalized patient care.European journal of medical research · 2025Article
- Two-centers machine learning analysis for predicting acid-fast bacilli results in tuberculosis sputum tests.Journal of clinical tuberculosis and other mycobacterial diseases · 2025Article
- Article
- Current application, possibilities, and challenges of artificial intelligence in the management of rheumatoid arthritis, axial spondyloarthritis, and psoriatic arthritis.Therapeutic advances in musculoskeletal disease · 2025Review
- Identification ofJournal of inflammation research · 2025Article
- Analysis of the predictive postoperative recurrence performance of three lymph node staging systems in patients with colon cancer.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence: a new cutting-edge tool in spine surgery.Asian spine journal · 2024Article
- Machine learning and deep learning for the diagnosis and treatment of ankylosing spondylitis- a scoping review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based identification of novel hub genes associated with oxidative stress in lupus nephritis: implications for diagnosis and therapeutic targets.Lupus science & medicine · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a diagnostic model to differentiate spinal tuberculosis from pyogenic spondylitis by combining multiple machine learning algorithms.Biomolecules & biomedicine · 2024Article
- Entry point of machine learning in axial spondyloarthritis.RMD open · 2024Review
- Comparison of the predictive performance of three lymph node staging systems for late-onset gastric cancer patients after surgery.Frontiers in surgery · 2024Article
- Development and validation of a machine learning-based nomogram for predicting HLA-B27 expression.BMC immunology · 2023Article
- To infer the probability of cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament and explore its impact on cervical surgery.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Application of machine learning in prediction of bone cement leakage during single-level thoracolumbar percutaneous vertebroplasty.BMC surgery · 2023Article
- Using Machine Learning to Predict Surgical Site Infection After Lumbar Spine Surgery.Infection and drug resistance · 2023Article
- Classification and prediction of spinal disease based on the SMOTE-RFE-XGBoost model.PeerJ. Computer science · 2023Article
- From past to future: Bibliometric analysis of global research productivity on nomogram (2000-2021).Frontiers in public health · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
introductionAnkylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic progressive inflammatory disease of the spine and its affiliated tissues. AS mainly affects the axial bone, sacroiliac joint, hip joint, spinal facet, and adjacent ligaments. We used machine learning (ML) methods to construct diagnostic models based on blood routine examination, liver function test, and kidney function test of patients with AS. This method will help clinicians enhance diagnostic efficiency and allow patients to receive systematic treatment as soon as possible.
methodsWe consecutively screened 348 patients with AS through complete blood routine examination, liver function test, and kidney function test at the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangxi Medical University according to the modified New York criteria (diagnostic criteria for AS). By using random sampling, the patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts. The training cohort included 258 patients with AS and 247 patients without AS, and the validation cohort included 90 patients with AS and 113 patients without AS. We used three ML methods (LASSO, random forest, and support vector machine recursive feature elimination) to screen feature variables and then took the intersection to obtain the prediction model. In addition, we used the prediction model on the validation cohort.
resultsSeven factors-erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), red blood cell count (RBC), mean platelet volume (MPV), albumin (ALB), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and creatinine (Cr)-were selected to construct a nomogram diagnostic model through ML. In the training cohort, the C value and area under the curve (AUC) value of this nomogram was 0.878 and 0.8779462, respectively. The C value and AUC value of the nomogram in the validation cohort was 0.823 and 0.8232055, respectively. Calibration curves in the training and validation cohorts showed satisfactory agreement between nomogram predictions and actual probabilities. The decision curve analysis showed that the nonadherence nomogram was clinically useful when intervention was decided at the nonadherence possibility threshold of 1%.
conclusionOur ML model can satisfactorily predict patients with AS. This nomogram can help orthopedic surgeons devise more personalized and rational clinical strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.