Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932337›Full record

ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2023

Evaluation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae modified via CRISPR/Cas9 as a cellulosic platform microorganism in simultaneously saccharification and fermentation processes.

Allan H F de Mélo, Alexia L Nunes, Priscila H Carvalho, Marcos F da Silva, Gleidson S Teixeira, Rosana Goldbeck

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Second-generation biorefinery: a Brazilian perspective.Bioprocess and biosystems engineering · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Allan H F de MéloBioprocess and Metabolic Engineering Laboratory, Food Engineering and Technology Department, School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Alexia L NunesBioprocess and Metabolic Engineering Laboratory, Food Engineering and Technology Department, School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Priscila H CarvalhoBioprocess and Metabolic Engineering Laboratory, Food Engineering and Technology Department, School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Marcos F da SilvaBioprocess and Metabolic Engineering Laboratory, Food Engineering and Technology Department, School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Gleidson S TeixeiraBioprocess and Metabolic Engineering Laboratory, Food Engineering and Technology Department, School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Rosana GoldbeckBioprocess and Metabolic Engineering Laboratory, Food Engineering and Technology Department, School of Food Engineering, University of Campinas, Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Goldbeck@unicamp.br.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 001Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico 307014/2020-7Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2015/20630-4Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2016/04602-3Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo 2019/08542-7
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nonrenewable character and deleterious effects of fossil fuels foster the need for cleaner and more inexhaustible energy sources, such as bioethanol. Especially from lignocellulosic biomasses. However, the economic viability of this product in the market depends on process optimization and cost reduction. This research applied a sequential experimental project to investigate the process of enzymatic saccharification and simultaneous fermentation to produce ethanol with sugarcane bagasse. The differential of the work was the application of the strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae AGY001 which was improved by evolutionary engineering to become thermotolerant and by a heterologous expression based on genomic integration by CRISPR/Cas9 to produce endoglucanase and β-glucosidase (AsENDO-AsBGL). The maximum ethanol yield found was 89% of the maximum theoretical yield (released sugars), obtained at temperature concentrations, sugarcane bagasse and inoculum at 40 °C, 16.5%, and 4.0 g/L, respectively (12.5 FPU/g bagasse). The mathematical model obtained can predict approximately 83% of the data set with 95% confidence. Therefore, these findings demonstrated the potential of sugarcane bagasse and S. cerevisiae AGY001 strain (CRISPR/Cas9 modified) in bioethanol production without the need for impractical selection media on an industrial scale, in addition to providing useful insights for the development of SSF processes.

Indexed as

CelluloseSaccharumCRISPR-Cas SystemsEthanolFermentationSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCelluloseEthanolBagasse sugarcaneBioprocessesCRISPR/Cas9Design experimentSSF

Identifiers

PMID35932337
OpenAlexW4289981887

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.