Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932319›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of urology2023

The role of multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.

Nathan Jung, Renzo G DiNatale, Jason Frankel, Hannah Koenig, On Ho, John Paul Flores, Christopher Porter

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Nathan Jung *Urology and Renal Transplantation Service, Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Renzo G DiNatale *Urology and Renal Transplantation Service, Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7867-2881
Jason FrankelUrology, SLU Care Urology, 6400 Clayton Rd, Clayton, MO, 63177, USA.
Hannah KoenigUrology and Renal Transplantation Service, Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
On HoUrology and Renal Transplantation Service, Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
John Paul FloresHematology and Oncology Service, Department of Medicine, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Christopher PorterUrology and Renal Transplantation Service, Department of Surgery, Virginia Mason Medical Center, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. christopher.porter@commonspirit.org.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTransrectal ultrasound (US) imaging is paramount to the successful completion of prostate biopsies. Certain US features have been associated with prostate cancer (PCa), but their utility remains controversial. We explored the role of multiparametric US (mpUS) in the detection of clinically significant PCa.

methodsWe performed a retrospective cohort study to contrast the findings of prostate MRI and mpUS. Patients who underwent MRI, US and biopsy between 2015 and 2021 were included. Biopsies were performed using a systematic approach (12 cores), as well as with MRI (4 cores/lesion) and US (1 core/lesion) targeting. The US features analyzed consisted of: calcifications, hypoechoic lesions and power or color Doppler positivity. Gleason 3 + 4 or higher was used as to define true positives. Measures of diagnostic accuracy were calculated for the different imaging modalities.

resultsThe final cohort included 74 patients, of which 24 (32.4%) had clinically significant PCa. The concordance between MRI and US was 63.5%. Seven individuals with discordant results had clinically significant PCa. MRI alone was more sensitive (87.5% vs 75%) but less specific (28% vs 32%) than US alone. An all-inclusive approach considering any suspicious US or MRI finding had a sensitivity of 95.8%. A more restrictive approach, targeting lesions noted in both US and MRI, yielded the highest specificity (50.0%) and accuracy (55.4%).

conclusionBiopsy targeting based on US findings can provide additional diagnostic information that may increase sensitivity or specificity. Additional research into this topic could open the door to a more personalized approach to prostate biopsy.

Indexed as

Image-Guided BiopsyProstatic NeoplasmsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleProstateRetrospective StudiesImaging-guided biopsyMultiparametric MRIProstate cancerSensitivity and specificityUltrasonography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.