Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932298›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2022

The impact of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) in gastric cancer.

Jorge Nogueiro, Hugo Santos-Sousa, André Pereira, Vítor Devezas, Cristina Fernandes, Fabiana Sousa, Telma Fonseca, Elisabete Barbosa, José Adelino Barbosa

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.3field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 55 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. A multicenter phase II trial of ramucirumab plus irinotecan for early recurrence of gastric cancer during or after adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel plus S-1 therapy: the RAMIEL trial (OGSG1901).Gastric cancer : official journal of the International Gastric Cancer Association and the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Beyond tumor biology: nursing interventions for psychological and immune health in cancer patients.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jorge NogueiroDepartment of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal. nogueiro.jorge@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0539-6003
Hugo Santos-SousaDepartment of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
André PereiraDepartment of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Vítor DevezasDepartment of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Cristina FernandesDepartment of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Fabiana SousaDepartment of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Telma FonsecaDepartment of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Elisabete BarbosaDepartment of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
José Adelino BarbosaDepartment of General Surgery, São João University Hospital Center, Porto, Portugal.
Universidade do Porto · PT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRegarding the assessment of patients' immune and nutritional status, prognostic nutritional index (PNI) has been reported as a predictive marker for surgical outcomes in various types of cancer. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effect of PNI in prognosis of gastric cancer patients submitted to curative-intent resectional surgery. MATERIAL AND

methodsA retrospective analysis with 637 gastric cancer cases submitted to curative-intent surgery, between 2010 and 2017, in an upper GI surgery unit. We analyzed 396 patients that met the inclusion criteria for this study. The median follow-up was 37 (0-113) months.

resultsAccording to Youden's method, the optimal PNI cutoff for OS was 41.625 (sensitivity 89.3% and specificity 41.3%). OS was significantly shorter in the lower-PNI group of patients when compared to the higher-PNI group (40.26 vs 77.49 months; p < 0.001). Higher PNI had a positive impact on OS in univariable analysis. When adjusted to pStage, higher PNI was still significantly associated with better OS (HR 0.405; CI 95% 0.253-0.649; p < 0.001). Regarding DFS, higher PNI was associated with better DFS (HR 0.421; CI 95% 0.218-0.815; p = 0.010). Higher-PNI group had a protective effect regarding postoperative morbidity and mortality.

conclusionsIn this cohort, PNI was disclosed to significantly impact GC patients' OS and DFS, including in multivariable analysis when adjusting for classical prognostic features. PNI can be used to predict patients at increased risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality. This index may be of use in identifying candidate patients who would benefit from perioperative nutritional support to improve surgical outcomes.

Indexed as

Nutrition AssessmentStomach NeoplasmsGastrectomyHumansNutritional StatusPrognosisRetrospective StudiesGastric cancerNutritionPrognosisSurvival

Identifiers

PMID35932298
OpenAlexW4289978714

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.