Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932249›Full record

ArticleSociology of health & illness2022

The needle pricking and two modes of 'doing good' in the Swedish school-based human papillomavirus vaccination programme.

Lisa Lindén, Ylva Odenbring

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sociology of health & illness, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Lisa LindénDepartment of Sociology and Work Science, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0001-9816-7164
Ylva OdenbringDepartment of Education, Communication and Learning, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-8221-8980

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this article, we draw on science and technology studies literature on care practices to analyse school nurses' work with human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination in schools, in the context of a new vaccination policy including all children in the fifth grade in Sweden. Drawing on 21 interviews with school nurses working in municipalities across a larger Swedish region, we focus on the mundane work of handling the vaccination and supporting the children while they are being vaccinated. We utilise the notion of 'modes of doing good' to analyse routines and ideals oriented towards specific, and sometimes contradictory, forms of 'good care' in HPV vaccination practice. Two modes of doing good are identified: the vaccination as a caring for 'the flow' of children getting vaccinated and the vaccination as a caring about the specific child. We analyse three 'child subjects' alongside these modes: the informed and already prepared child, the anxious child, and the specific child. By identifying tensions and interferences between different child subjects and modes of doing good, we discuss possible consequences of our findings for how HPV vaccination is envisioned and conceptualised in social science research and in policy settings.

Indexed as

AlphapapillomavirusPapillomavirus InfectionsPapillomavirus VaccinesChildHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansSwedenVaccinationPapillomavirus Vaccinescare practiceschildrenHPV vaccinationmodes of doing goodschool nursestensions

Identifiers

PMID35932249
PMCPMC9545275

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.