Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932230›Full record

Trial reportThe British journal of surgery2022

Antibiotic prophylaxis in breast cancer surgery (PAUS trial): randomised clinical double-blind parallel-group multicentre superiority trial.

Sheila Stallard, Francesca Savioli, Alex McConnachie, John Norrie, Katie Dudman, Elizabeth S Morrow, Laszlo Romics

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyEquivalence Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The British journal of surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Sheila StallardGartnavel General Hospital, Gartnavel General Hospital, Glasgow, UK.
Francesca SavioliAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Alex McConnachieRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7262-7000
John NorrieUsher Institute, College of Medicine and Veterinary Medicine, Edinburgh, UK.
Katie DudmanRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Glasgow, UK.
Elizabeth S MorrowAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.
Laszlo RomicsAcademic Unit of Surgery, School of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Glasgow, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8824-5501
Glasgow Royal Infirmary · GBThe Robertson Trust · GBGartnavel General Hospital · GB

Funding

British Society of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy GA391
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParticipants were patients with invasive breast cancer undergoing primary surgery. The aim was to test whether a single dose of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid would reduce wound infection at 30 days postoperatively, and to identify risk factors for infection.

methodsParticipants were randomised to either a single bolus of 1.2 g intravenous amoxicillin-clavulanic acid after the induction of anaesthesia (intervention) or no antibiotic (control). The primary outcome was the incidence of wound infection at 30 days postoperatively.

resultsThere were 871 evaluable patients. Of these, 438 received prophylactic antibiotic and 433 served as controls. Seventy-one (16.2 per cent) patients in the intervention group developed a wound infection by 30 days, while there were 83 (19.2 per cent) infections in the control group. This was not statistically significant (odds ratio (OR) 0.82, 95 per cent c.i. 0.58 to 1.15; P = 0.250). The risk of infection increased for every 5 kg/m2 of BMI (OR 1.29, 95 per cent c.i. 1.10 to 1.52; P = 0.003). Patients who were preoperative carriers of Staphylococcus aureus had an increased risk of postoperative wound infection; however, there was no benefit of preoperative antibiotics for patients with either a high BMI or who were carriers of S. aureus.

conclusionThere was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful reduction in wound infection at 30 days following breast cancer surgery in patients who received a single dose of amoxicillin-clavulanic acid preoperatively. REGISTRATION NUMBER: N0399145605 (National Research Register).

Indexed as

Antibiotic ProphylaxisBreast NeoplasmsAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial AgentsFemaleHumansStaphylococcus aureusSurgical Wound InfectionAmoxicillin-Potassium Clavulanate CombinationAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID35932230
PMCPMC10364710
OpenAlexW4300761490

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.