Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932226›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of heredity2022

Extensive genome introgression between domestic ferret and European polecat during population recovery in Great Britain.

Graham J Etherington, Adam Ciezarek, Rebecca Shaw, Johan Michaux, Elizabeth Croose, Wilfried Haerty, Federica Di Palma

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of heredity, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The impacts of European arrival on Australian dingoes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Graham J EtheringtonOrganisms and Ecosystems, The Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-5003-1425
Adam CiezarekOrganisms and Ecosystems, The Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-8839-3579
Rebecca ShawOrganisms and Ecosystems, The Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6841-0442
Johan MichauxDepartment of Life Sciences, University of Liège, 4000 Liège, Belgium.ORCID 0000-0003-4644-9244
Elizabeth CrooseThe Vincent Wildlife Trust, Ledbury, Herefordshire, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-6353-4550
Wilfried HaertyOrganisms and Ecosystems, The Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0003-0111-191X
Federica Di PalmaOrganisms and Ecosystems, The Earlham Institute, Norwich Research Park, Norwich, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-4394-0102
Norwich Research Park · GBUniversity of East Anglia · GBUniversity of Liège · BEVincent Wildlife Trust · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/CCG1720/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The European polecat (Mustela putorius) is a mammalian predator which occurs across much of Europe east to the Ural Mountains. In Great Britain, following years of persecution the range of the European polecat contracted and by the early 1900s was restricted to unmanaged forests of central Wales. The European polecat has recently undergone a population increase due to legal protection and its range now overlaps that of feral domestic ferrets (Mustela putorius furo). During this range expansion, European polecats hybridized with feral domestic ferrets producing viable offspring. Here, we carry out population-level whole-genome sequencing on 8 domestic ferrets, 19 British European polecats, and 15 European polecats from the European mainland. We used a range of population genomics methods to examine the data, including phylogenetics, phylogenetic graphs, model-based clustering, phylogenetic invariants, ABBA-BABA tests, topology weighting, and Fst. We found high degrees of genome introgression in British polecats outside their previous stronghold, even in those individuals phenotyped as "pure" polecats. These polecats ranged from presumed F1 hybrids (gamma = 0.53) to individuals that were much less introgressed (gamma = 0.2). We quantify this introgression and find introgressed genes containing Fst outliers associated with cognitive function and sight.

Indexed as

FerretsAnimalsEuropeHumansPhenotypePhylogenyUnited Kingdomconservationdomestic ferretEuropean polecatgenomicsintrogressionMustelids

Identifiers

PMID35932226
PMCPMC9584812
OpenAlexW4290075644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.