Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932168›Full record

ArticleHealth & social care in the community2022

"We are on the frontlines too": A qualitative content analysis of US social workers' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Julie A Cederbaum, Abigail M Ross, Lisa de Saxe Zerden, Lilly Estenson, Jennifer Zelnick, Betty J Ruth

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & social care in the community, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Julie A CederbaumSuzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4289-1820
Abigail M RossGraduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York City, New York, USA.
Lisa de Saxe ZerdenSchool of Social Work, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA.
Lilly EstensonLeonard Davis School of Gerontology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Jennifer ZelnickTouro College Graduate School of Social Work, New York City, New York, USA.
Betty J RuthSchool of Social Work, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Social work has been a part of the essential workforce historically and throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, yet lack recognition. This work explores the experiences and invisibility of social workers within the pandemic response. Data are drawn from a large cross-sectional survey of US-based social worker from June to August of 2020. A summative content analysis of responses to the question 'What do you wish people knew about social work during the COVID-19 pandemic' was undertaken. Participants (n = 515) were majority white (72.1%) and female (90.8%). Seven coding categories were subsequently collapsed into three domains: (1) meeting basic needs, (2) well-being (emotional distress and dual role) and (3) professional invisibility (workplace equals, physical safety, professional invisibility and organisational invisibility). Meeting social needs requires broad-based policies that strengthen the health and social safety net. Social workers have and will continue to play a critical role in the response, and recovery from COVID-19. Organisational and governmental policies must expand to increase the visibility and responsiveness to the needs of social care providers.

Indexed as

COVID-19PandemicsCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHealth PersonnelHumansSocial WorkersCOVIDessential workersfrontline workerspolicysocial work

Identifiers

PMID35932168
PMCPMC9539110

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.