ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2023
Assessment of Neurological Impairment and Recovery Using Statistical Models of Neurologically Healthy Behavior.
Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disrupted proprioceptive timing estimates contribute to upper limb motor impairment in chronic stroke.Experimental brain research · 2026Article
- Reducing robotic upper-limb assessment time while maintaining precision: a time series foundation model approach.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Characterizing visual compensation for proprioceptive impairments during the subacute phase of stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
- Brain connectivity signatures of cognitive impairment in temporal lobe epilepsy identified by robotic assessment.Neuroimage. Reports · 2026Article
- Patterns of Structural Disconnection Driving Proprioceptive Deficits in Chronic Stroke.Stroke · 2026Observational
- Exploring Hypoxia-Induced Neuroprotection Mechanisms in Post-Stroke Recovery.Translational stroke research · 2025Review
- A pilot study for self-guided, active robotic training of proprioception of the upper limb in chronic stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2025Article
- Exploring the Link Between Motor Functions and the Relative Use of the More Affected Arm in Adults with Cerebral Palsy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Resting state functional connectivity associated with impaired proprioception post-stroke.Human brain mapping · 2024Article
- A robot-based interception task to quantify upper limb impairments in proprioceptive and visual feedback after stroke.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2023Article
- Proportional Recovery After Stroke: Addressing Concerns Regarding Mathematical Coupling and Ceiling Effects.Neurorehabilitation and neural repair · 2023Review
- Clinical, Neuroimaging and Robotic Measures Predict Long-Term Proprioceptive Impairments following Stroke.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Calibration of Impairment Severity to Enable Comparison across Somatosensory Domains.Brain sciences · 2023Article
- Directional and general impairments in initiating motor responses after stroke.Brain communications · 2023Article
- Alterations in the preferred direction of individual arm muscle activation after stroke.Frontiers in neurology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While many areas of medicine have benefited from the development of objective assessment tools and biomarkers, there have been comparatively few improvements in techniques used to assess brain function and dysfunction. Brain functions such as perception, cognition, and motor control are commonly measured using criteria-based, ordinal scales which can be coarse, have floor/ceiling effects, and often lack the precision to detect change. There is growing recognition that kinematic and kinetic-based measures are needed to quantify impairments following neurological injury such as stroke, in particular for clinical research and clinical trials. This paper will first consider the challenges with using criteria-based ordinal scales to quantify impairment and recovery. We then describe how kinematic-based measures can overcome many of these challenges and highlight a statistical approach to quantify kinematic measures of behavior based on performance of neurologically healthy individuals. We illustrate this approach with a visually-guided reaching task to highlight measures of impairment for individuals following stroke. Finally, there has been considerable controversy about the calculation of motor recovery following stroke. Here, we highlight how our statistical-based approach can provide an effective estimate of impairment and recovery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.