Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932096›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics2023

Risk factors for anxiety and depression among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a web-based multinational cross-sectional study.

Anna Kajdy, Dorota Sys, Artur Pokropek, Steven W Shaw, Tung-Yao Chang, Pavel Calda, Ganesh Acharya, Maya Ben-Zion, Tal Biron-Shental, Dariusz Borowski and 20 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Risk factors for anxiety and depression among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic: Results of a web-based multinational cross-sectional study.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

30 authors at 20 institutions in 18 countries.

Anna KajdyDepartment of Reproductive Health, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3581-8120
Dorota SysDepartment of Reproductive Health, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6829-5947
Artur PokropekInstitute of Philosophy and Sociology of the Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
Steven W ShawDepartment of Obstetrics, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.
Tung-Yao ChangDepartment of Fetal Medicine, Taiji Clinic, Taipei, Taiwan.
Pavel CaldaFetal Medicine Center, First Medical Faculty of the Charles University and General Teaching Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.
Ganesh AcharyaDivision of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology (CLINTEC), Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Maya Ben-ZionWomen's Health and Perinatology Research Group Institute of Clinical Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Tal Biron-ShentalWomen's Health and Perinatology Research Group Institute of Clinical Medicine Faculty of Health Sciences UiT-The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Dariusz BorowskiNicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Collegium Medicum in Bydgoszcz, The Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Perinatology, Gynacology and Gynecologic Oncology, Toruń, Poland.
Bartosz CzubaChair and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Faculty of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Poland.
Adolfo EtchegarayHospital Universitario Austral, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Stepan FeduniwDepartment of Reproductive Health, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Rosario Garcia-MandujanoFetal Medicine Mexico A.C, Tabasco, Mexico.
Monica Garcia SantacruzCentro Hondureño De Medicina Fetal, Honduras.
Maria M GilHospital Universitario de Torrejón, School of Medicine. Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Sonia HassanDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Sebastian KwiatkowskiDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Arancha Martin-AriasHospital Universitario de Torrejón, School of Medicine. Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Madrid, Spain.
Raigam Jafet Martinez-PortillaClinical Research Division, National Institute of Perinatology, Mexico City, Mexico.
Federico PrefumoDepartment of Clinical and Experimental Sciences, University of Brescia, Italy.
Michał RabijewskiDepartment of Reproductive Health, Center of Postgraduate Medical Education, Warsaw, Poland.
Laurent J SalomonMédecine et Chirurgie Foetales, Maternité-Hôpital Universitaire Necker-Enfants Malades, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Université de Paris, France.
Heidi TillerWomen's Health and Perinatology Research Group, Institute of Clinical medicine, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway.
Stefan VerlohrenDepartment of Obstetrics, Medical School - Charité - University Medicine Berlin, Germany.
Hian Yan VoonMaternal Fetal Medicine Specialist, Sarawak General Hospital, Kuching, Malaysia.
Omar Fernando Yanque-RoblesResearch Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, Lima, Peru.
Soon Leong YongDepartment of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, Hospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan, Kuantan, Malaysia.
Liona C PoonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Prince of Wales Hospital, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3944-4130
Mind-COVID Collaborative Team
Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine · PLTel Aviv University · ILUniversidad Francisco de Vitoria · ESChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWCharité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DECharles University · CZChinese University of Hong Kong · HKConsejo de Ciencia y Tecnología del Estado de Tabasco · MXHonduras Foundation for Agricultural Research · HNHôpital Necker-Enfants Malades · FRHospital Nacional Cayetano Heredia · PEHospital Tengku Ampuan Afzan · MYHospital Universitario Austral · ARInstitute of Philosophy and Sociology · PLInstituto Nacional de Perinatología · MXKarolinska Institutet · SEMedical University of Silesia · PLNicolaus Copernicus University · PLPomeranian Medical University · PLSarawak General Hospital · MY

Funding

Centre of Postgraduate Medical Education 501-1-081-34-21
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo assess risk factors for anxiety and depression among pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic using Mind-COVID, a prospective cross-sectional study that compares outcomes in middle-income economies and high-income economies.

methodsA total of 7102 pregnant women from 12 high-income economies and nine middle-income economies were included. The web-based survey used two standardized instruments, General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) and Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9).

resultPregnant women in high-income economies reported higher PHQ-9 (0.18 standard deviation [SD], P < 0.001) and GAD-7 (0.08 SD, P = 0.005) scores than those living in middle-income economies. Multivariate regression analysis showed that increasing PHQ-9 and GAD-7 scales were associated with mental health problems during pregnancy and the need for psychiatric treatment before pregnancy. PHQ-9 was associated with a feeling of burden related to restrictions in social distancing, and access to leisure activities. GAD-7 scores were associated with a pregnancy-related complication, fear of adverse outcomes in children related to COVID-19, and feeling of burden related to finances.

conclusionsAccording to this study, the imposed public health measures and hospital restrictions have left pregnant women more vulnerable during these difficult times. Adequate partner and family support during pregnancy and childbirth can be one of the most important protective factors against anxiety and depression, regardless of national economic status.

Indexed as

COVID-19Pregnancy ComplicationsAnxietyAnxiety DisordersChildCross-Sectional StudiesDepressionFemaleHumansInternetPandemicsPregnancyPregnant PeopleProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSARS-CoV-2anxietycoronavirus disease 2019cross-sectional studiesdepressioneconomic statusmental healthpatient health questionnairepregnant women

Identifiers

PMID35932096
PMCPMC9538861
OpenAlexW4290039742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.