Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932043›Full record

ArticleBMC biology2022

Segmentation, tracking and cell cycle analysis of live-cell imaging data with Cell-ACDC.

Francesco Padovani, Benedikt Mairhörmann, Pascal Falter-Braun, Jette Lengefeld, Kurt M Schmoller

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 57 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed
18.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Artificial intelligence virtual bone organoids (AIVBOs).Journal of orthopaedic translation · 2026
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 3 countries.

Francesco PadovaniInstitute of Functional Epigenetics (IFE), Molecular Targets and Therapeutics Center (MTTC), Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany. francesco.padovani@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0003-2540-8240
Benedikt MairhörmannInstitute of Functional Epigenetics (IFE), Molecular Targets and Therapeutics Center (MTTC), Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8012-9303
Pascal Falter-BraunInstitute of Network Biology (INET), Molecular Targets and Therapeutics Center (MTTC), Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2012-6746
Jette LengefeldInstitute of Biotechnology, HiLIFE, University of Helsinki, Biocenter 2, P.O.Box 56 (Viikinkaari 5 D), 00014, Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0001-6021-7613
Kurt M SchmollerInstitute of Functional Epigenetics (IFE), Molecular Targets and Therapeutics Center (MTTC), Helmholtz Center Munich, 85764, Munich-Neuherberg, Germany. kurt.schmoller@helmholtz-muenchen.de.ORCID 0000-0001-5790-5204
Helmholtz Zentrum München · DETarget (Germany) · DEUniversity of Helsinki · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-throughput live-cell imaging is a powerful tool to study dynamic cellular processes in single cells but creates a bottleneck at the stage of data analysis, due to the large amount of data generated and limitations of analytical pipelines. Recent progress on deep learning dramatically improved cell segmentation and tracking. Nevertheless, manual data validation and correction is typically still required and tools spanning the complete range of image analysis are still needed.

resultsWe present Cell-ACDC, an open-source user-friendly GUI-based framework written in Python, for segmentation, tracking and cell cycle annotations. We included state-of-the-art deep learning models for single-cell segmentation of mammalian and yeast cells alongside cell tracking methods and an intuitive, semi-automated workflow for cell cycle annotation of single cells. Using Cell-ACDC, we found that mTOR activity in hematopoietic stem cells is largely independent of cell volume. By contrast, smaller cells exhibit higher p38 activity, consistent with a role of p38 in regulation of cell size. Additionally, we show that, in S. cerevisiae, histone Htb1 concentrations decrease with replicative age.

conclusionsCell-ACDC provides a framework for the application of state-of-the-art deep learning models to the analysis of live cell imaging data without programming knowledge. Furthermore, it allows for visualization and correction of segmentation and tracking errors as well as annotation of cell cycle stages. We embedded several smart algorithms that make the correction and annotation process fast and intuitive. Finally, the open-source and modularized nature of Cell-ACDC will enable simple and fast integration of new deep learning-based and traditional methods for cell segmentation, tracking, and downstream image analysis. Source code: https://github.com/SchmollerLab/Cell_ACDC.

Indexed as

Image Processing, Computer-AssistedSaccharomyces cerevisiaeCell CycleCell TrackingSoftwareBioimage analysisCell cycle analysisCell trackingDeep-learning cell segmentationLive-cell imaging

Identifiers

PMID35932043
PMCPMC9356409
OpenAlexW4290080925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.