Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932040›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2022

Life in lockdown: a longitudinal study investigating the impact of the UK COVID-19 lockdown measures on lifestyle behaviours and mental health.

Emma Solomon-Moore, Jeffrey Lambert, Elisabeth Grey, Fiona Gillison, Nick Townsend, Betty Busam, Kyriakos Velemis, Christopher Millen, Fran Baber, Tania Griffin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Emma Solomon-MooreDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Jeffrey LambertDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK. jl2426@bath.ac.uk.
Elisabeth GreyDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Fiona GillisonDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Nick TownsendDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Betty BusamDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Kyriakos VelemisDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Christopher MillenDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Fran BaberDepartment of Psychology, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
Tania GriffinDepartment for Health, University of Bath, Claverton Down, Bath, BA2 7AY, UK.
University of Bath · GBUniversity of Bristol · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic led to the UK government enforcing lockdown restrictions to control virus transmission. Such restrictions present opportunities and barriers for physical activity and healthy eating. Emerging research suggests that in the early stages of the pandemic, physical activity levels decreased, consumption of unhealthy foods increased, while levels of mental distress increased. Our aims were to understand patterns of diet, physical activity, and mental health during the first lockdown, how these had changed twelve-months later, and the factors associated with change.

methodsAn online survey was conducted with UK adults (N = 636; 78% female) during the first national lockdown (May-June 2020). The survey collected information on demographics, physical activity, diet, mental health, and how participants perceived lifestyle behaviours had changed from before the pandemic. Participants who provided contact details were invited to complete a twelve-month follow-up survey (May-June 2021), 160 adults completed the survey at both time-points. Descriptive statistics, T-tests and McNemar Chi Square statistics were used to assess patterns of diet, physical activity, and mental health at baseline and change in behaviours between baseline and follow-up. Linear regression models were conducted to explore prospective associations between demographic and psycho-social variables at baseline with change in healthy eating habit, anxiety, and wellbeing respectively.

resultsBetween baseline and follow-up, healthy eating habit strength, and the importance of and confidence in eating healthily reduced. Self-rated health (positively) and confidence in eating healthily (negatively) were associated with change in healthy eating habit. There were no differences between baseline and follow-up for depression or physical activity. Mean anxiety score reduced, and wellbeing increased, from baseline to follow-up. Living with children aged 12-17 (compared to living alone) was associated with an increase in anxiety, while perceiving mental health to have worsened during the first lockdown (compared to staying the same) was associated with reduced anxiety and an increase in mental wellbeing.

conclusionsWhile healthy eating habits worsened in the 12 months since the onset of the pandemic, anxiety and mental wellbeing improved. However, anxiety may have increased for parents of secondary school aged children.

Indexed as

COVID-19AdultChildCommunicable Disease ControlFemaleHumansLife StyleLongitudinal StudiesMaleMental HealthPandemicsUnited KingdomCoronavirus pandemicCOVID-19DietLifestyle behavioursLockdown restrictionsLongitudinalMental healthPhysical activity

Identifiers

PMID35932040
PMCPMC9354438
OpenAlexW4289941612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.