Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932026›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2022

Prevalence and municipal variation in chronic musculoskeletal pain among independent older people: data from the Japan Gerontological Evaluation Study (JAGES).

Keiko Yamada, Tomoko Fujii, Yasuhiko Kubota, Takaaki Ikeda, Masamichi Hanazato, Naoki Kondo, Ko Matsudaira, Katsunori Kondo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Keiko YamadaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. keiko-yamada@umin.org.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4378-3290
Tomoko FujiiDepartment of Medical Research and Management for Musculoskeletal Pain, 22nd Century Medical and Research Center, the University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6212-9270
Yasuhiko KubotaOsaka Center for Cancer and Cardiovascular Diseases Prevention, Osaka, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3270-2176
Takaaki IkedaDepartment of Health Policy Science, Graduate School of Medical Science, Yamagata University, Yamagata, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4325-4492
Masamichi HanazatoDepartment of Environmental Preventive Medical Sciences, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0317-7616
Naoki KondoDepartment of Social Epidemiology, Graduate School of Medicine and School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6425-6844
Ko MatsudairaDepartment of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5584-5367
Katsunori KondoDepartment of Social Preventive Medical Sciences, Center for Preventive Medical Sciences, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0076-816X
Chiba University · JPJuntendo University · JPKyoto University · JPOsaka International Cancer Institute · JPUniversity of Tokyo Hospital · JPYamagata University · JP

Funding

Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development JP17dk0110017, JP18dk0110027, JP18ls0110002, JP18le0110009, JP19dk0110034, JP20dk0110034, JP21dk0110037Japan Science and Technology, Japan OPERA, JPMJOP1831Japan Society for the Promotion of Science JP15H01972, 18H00953, 18H03047, 18H04071, 19K19818, 19H03860, 19H03915, 20H00557, 20H03954, 21H03196, 21K11108Japan Society for the Promotion of Science Overseas Research Fellowships (ID is not available)Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare H28-Choju-Ippan-002, 19FA2001, 19FA1012, 21GA0101, 19FG2001, 22FG2001National Center for Geriatrics and Gerontology, Japan 20-19, 21-20, 29-42, 30-22Niimi University, Japan 1915010Sasakawa Sports Foundation a grant from Innovative Research Program on Suicide Countermeasures (1-4)the 8020 Promotion Foundation, Japan 19-2-06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUrbanization and population aging may affect prevalence of chronic pain from various causes. This cross-sectional study aimed to investigate the prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain, including some subtypes, in independent Japanese older people, and whether population density and population aging rate explained prevalence and differences in pain levels between municipalities.

methodsWe analyzed data from 12,883 independent older people living in 58 municipalities who completed mailed questionnaires and did not need support for daily living. We identified three types of pain: "chronic musculoskeletal pain" lasting ≥ 3 months (overall and in each part of the body), "chronic widespread-type pain" in the spinal and peripheral area, and "chronic multisite pain" in at least three sites. The latter two were measured using new definitions. These types of pain are correlated with depressive symptoms and we therefore examined the construct validity of the definitions by comparing the Geriatric Depression Scale score. We also used analysis of covariance to compare the prevalence of these three types of pain between municipalities. Odds ratios, median odds ratios, and the municipal variance in prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain were estimated by Bayesian multilevel logistic regression analysis using the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method.

resultsThe construct validity of the definitions of chronic widespread-type pain and chronic multisite pain was confirmed. The prevalence of the three types of pain (chronic musculoskeletal, widespread, and multisite pain) was 39.0%, 13.9%, and 10.3%, respectively. Chronic musculoskeletal pain showed a higher prevalence among older people and women. Individuals in underpopulated, suburban, or metropolitan areas tended to have more pain than those in urban areas, but this was not statistically significant (odds ratio [95% credible interval] 1.15 [0.86-1.51], 1.17 [0.93-1.43], 1.17 [0.94-1.46]). Population density and population aging rate did not explain the differences between municipalities.

conclusionsThe prevalence of chronic musculoskeletal pain was consistent with previous global reports. Areas with overpopulation and depopulation tended to have higher pain prevalence, but population density and population aging rate did not explain municipal variance. Further research is needed to identify other factors that contribute to regional variance.

Indexed as

Chronic PainMusculoskeletal PainAgedBayes TheoremCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansJapanPrevalenceAgedChronic painCohort studiesMusculoskeletal painWidespread chronic pain

Identifiers

PMID35932026
PMCPMC9356514
OpenAlexW4289939366

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.