Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35932022›Full record

ArticleBMC cancer2022

Prognostic value of systemic inflammation response index in nasopharyngeal carcinoma with negative Epstein-Barr virus DNA.

Xiaofei Yuan, Hua Yang, Fangfang Zeng, Shiyu Zhou, Shuting Wu, Yue Yuan, Linchong Cui, Huiru Feng, Danfan Lin, Zilu Chen and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Xiaofei Yuan *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Hua Yang *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Fangfang Zeng *Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Shiyu ZhouDepartment of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, (Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Tropical Disease Research), Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China.
Shuting WuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Yue YuanDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Linchong CuiDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Huiru FengDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Danfan LinDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Zilu ChenDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China.
Xiong LiuDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China. liux1218@126.com.
Jing ChenSchool of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, 510515, Guangdong, China. liuchengjing@126.com.
Fan WangDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Baiyun District, Jingxi Street, Guangzhou, 510515, People's Republic of China. wf493649053@qq.com.
Southern Medical University · CNNanfang Hospital · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81902774Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1515010176Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province 2020A1515010596
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInflammatory parameters and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA status have been confirmed to be associated with prognosis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients. However, there are few in-depth studies on the prognosis of NPC patients with negative EBV DNA. Our study aimed to look for inflammatory biomarkers that can identify disease progression in NPC patients with negative EBV DNA.

methodsA total of 795 NPC patients were recruited, and ultimately 325 NPC patients with negative EBV DNA were included in this study (170 in training cohort and 155 in validation cohort). Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were used to analyze progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The multivariate analysis of Cox proportional hazards regression model was used to determine the independent prognostic factors. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess prognostic value. The logistic regression was used to evaluate the relationship between EBV DNA status and inflammatory parameters. The correlation between clinical characteristics was analyzed by the chi-squared test or the Fisher's exact test.

resultsThe optimal cutoff point for the SIRI was 1.12. The EBV DNA-negative NPC patients with high SIRI level had worse PFS and OS (all p < 0.001). In multivariate Cox proportional hazard models analysis, SIRI was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS (all p < 0.05), and had higher prognostic value than other indicators. Above results were found in the training cohort and confirmed in the validation cohort. In addition, EBV DNA status was not associated with any inflammatory parameters.

conclusionsThe SIRI can provide more accurate risk stratification and better prognostic prediction for NPC patients with negative EBV DNA.

Indexed as

Epstein-Barr Virus InfectionsNasopharyngeal NeoplasmsDNA, ViralHerpesvirus 4, HumanHumansInflammationNasopharyngeal CarcinomaPrognosisDNA, ViralEpstein–Barr virusNasopharyngeal carcinomaPrognosisRisk stratificationSystemic inflammation response index

Identifiers

PMID35932022
PMCPMC9356473
OpenAlexW4289938182

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.