Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35931979›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2022

Multiparametric MR radiomics in brain glioma: models comparation to predict biomarker status.

Jinlong He, Jialiang Ren, Guangming Niu, Aishi Liu, Qiong Wu, Shenghui Xie, Xueying Ma, Bo Li, Peng Wang, Jing Shen and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. [Research Progress in Imaging Investigation of TERT Promoter Mutations in Gliomas].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2024
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Jinlong He *Graduate School, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, 300070, China.
Jialiang Ren *GE Healthcare Co., Ltd., Shanghai, 210000, China.
Guangming NiuDepartment of Imaging Diagnosis, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Aishi LiuDepartment of Imaging Diagnosis, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Qiong WuDepartment of Imaging Diagnosis, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Shenghui XieDepartment of Imaging Diagnosis, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Xueying MaDepartment of Imaging Diagnosis, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Bo LiDepartment of Imaging Diagnosis, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Peng WangDepartment of Imaging Diagnosis, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010000, China.
Jing ShenDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, China.
Jianlin WuDepartment of Radiology, Affiliated Zhongshan Hospital of Dalian University, Dalian, 116001, China. cjr.wujianlin@vip.163.com.
Yang GaoDepartment of Imaging Diagnosis, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, 010000, China. 1390903990@qq.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenotype status of glioma have important significance to clinical treatment and prognosis. At present, there are few studies on the prediction of multiple genotype status in glioma by method of multi-sequence radiomics. The purpose of the study is to compare the performance of clinical features (age, sex, WHO grade, MRI morphological features etc.), radiomics features from multi MR sequence (T2WI, T1WI, DWI, ADC, CE-MRI (contrast enhancement)), and a combined multiple features model in predicting biomarker status (IDH, MGMT, TERT, 1p/19q of glioma.

methodsIn this retrospective analysis, 81 glioma patients confirmed by histology were enrolled in this study. Five MRI sequences were used for radiomic feature extraction. Finally, 107 features were extracted from each sequence on Pyradiomics software, separately. These included 18 first-order metrics, such as the mean, standard deviation, skewness, and kurtosis etc., 14 shape features and second-order metrics including 24 grey level run length matrix (GLCM), 16 grey level run length matrix (GLRLM), 16 grey level size zone matrix (GLSZM), 5 neighboring gray tone difference matrix (NGTDM), and 14 grey level dependence matrix (GLDM). Then, Univariate analysis and LASSO (Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model were used to data dimension reduction, feature selection, and radiomics signature building. Significant features (p < 0.05 by multivariate logistic regression were retained to establish clinical model, T1WI model, T2WI model, T1 + C (T1WI contrast enhancement model, DWI model and ADC model, multi sequence model. Clinical features were combined with multi sequence model to establish a combined model. The predictive performance was validated by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).

resultsThe combined model showed the better performance in some groups of genotype status among some models (IDH AUC = 0.93, MGMT AUC = 0.88, TERT AUC = 0.76). Multi sequence model performed better than single sequence model in IDH, MGMT, TERT. There was no significant difference among the models in predicting 1p/19q status. Decision curve analysis showed combined model has higher clinical benefit than multi sequence model.

conclusionMulti sequence model is an effective method to identify the genotype status of cerebral glioma. Combined with clinical models can better distinguish genotype status of glioma. KEY POINTS: The combined model showed the higher performance compare with other models in predicting genotype status of IDH, MGMT, TERT. Multi sequence model showed a better predictive model than that of a single sequence model. Compared with other models, the combined model and multi sequence model show no advantage in prediction of 1p/19q status.

Indexed as

GliomaBiomarkersBrainHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingRetrospective StudiesBiomarkersGliomaHistopathologyMagnetic resonance imagingRadiomics

Identifiers

PMID35931979
PMCPMC9354364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.