Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35931968›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2022

Making a HIIT: study protocol for assessing the feasibility and effects of co-designing high-intensity interval training workouts with students and teachers.

Stephanie L Duncombe, Alan R Barker, Lisa Price, Jacqueline L Walker, Paul E Dux, Amaya Fox, Natasha Matthews, Michalis Stylianou

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Was it a HIIT? A process evaluation of a school-based high-intensity interval training intervention.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie L DuncombeSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia. s.duncombe@uq.net.au.ORCID 0000-0003-0673-6409
Alan R BarkerChildren's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8610-5417
Lisa PriceChildren's Health and Exercise Research Centre, Sport and Health Sciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
Jacqueline L WalkerSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
Paul E DuxSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
Amaya FoxSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
Natasha MatthewsSchool of Psychology, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.
Michalis StylianouSchool of Human Movement and Nutrition Sciences, The University of Queensland, Saint Lucia, Queensland, 4072, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5905-8229
The University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Exeter · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHigh-intensity interval training (HIIT) is an effective strategy for improving a variety of health outcomes within the school setting. However, there is limited research on the implementation of school-based HIIT interventions and the integration of HIIT within the Health and Physical Education (HPE) curriculum. The aims of the Making a HIIT study are to: 1) describe the methodology and evaluate the feasibility of co-designing HIIT workouts with students and teachers in HPE; 2) determine the effect of co-designed HIIT workouts on cardiorespiratory and muscular fitness, and executive function; 3) understand the effect of co-design on students' motivation, enjoyment, and self-efficacy towards the workouts; and 4) evaluate the implementation of the intervention.

methodsThree schools will participate. Within each school, three different groups will be formed from Year 7 and 8 classes: 1) Co-Designers; 2) HIIT Only; and 3) Control. The study will include two phases. In phase one, Group 1 will co-design HIIT workouts as part of the HPE curriculum using an iterative process with the researcher, teacher, and students as collaborators. This process will be evaluated using student discussions, student surveys, and teacher interviews. In phase two, Groups 1 and 2 will use the co-designed 10-minute HIIT workouts in HPE for 8-weeks. Group 3 (control) will continue their regular HPE lessons. All students will participate in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscular fitness, and executive function assessments before and after the HIIT program or control period. Students will complete questionnaires on their motivation, enjoyment, and self-efficacy of the workouts. Differences between groups will be assessed using linear regressions to account for covariates. Heart rate and rating of perceived exertion will be collected during each HIIT session. The implementation will be evaluated using the Framework for Effective Implementation. Ethical approval was granted by the University of Queensland Human Research Ethics Committee and other relevant bodies. DISCUSSION: This study will be the first to co-design HIIT workouts with teachers and students within the HPE curriculum. As this study relies on co-design, each HIIT workout will differ, which will add variability between HIIT workouts but increase the ecological validity of the study.

trial registrationACTRN, ACTRN12622000534785, Registered 5 April 2022 - Retrospectively registered, https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12622000534785.aspx.

Indexed as

High-Intensity Interval TrainingFeasibility StudiesHumansPhysical Education and TrainingSchool Health ServicesStudentsCardiometabolic healthEducational settingsExerciseProgram evaluationWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID35931968
PMCPMC9354328
OpenAlexW4289878610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.