ArticleIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2022
The future of university from different viewpoints: a commentary to Szulevicz et al. (2021).
Article in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This commentary is connecting the dots between the publication of Szulevicz et al., (2021) about the discrepancy of students' master theses and mainstream research and the upcoming book about the future of universities edited by Geberth & Woller (2023). University is changing fast, which can be prominently seen by comparing published research and the work of students. Danish students are seen as fulfilling Humboldt's ideal choosing niche topics for their theses. Meanwhile Austrian students demand more practical skills from their studies and German lecturers ask themselves, how much practice orientation might be too much. Neoliberalism seems to be at the bottom of the drastic changes which universities are going through. The authors criticize the influence of external funding on research in general.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35931940What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.