ArticleAnalytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry2022
Development of a canine blood C-reactive protein-measuring device using a flow-type immunosensor.
Article in Analytical sciences : the international journal of the Japan Society for Analytical Chemistry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to construct a measurement system with the same performance as a measurement system using an automated analyzer and immunoturbidimetric reagents (comparative method) using a flow-type immunosensor (FIS) based on the fluorescence-linked immunosorbent assay technology. In the FIS constructed in this study, all control samples were within the indicated values. The coefficient of variation of repeatability and intermediate precision were less than 2.4% and less than 4.4%, respectively. The lower limit of quantification in this measurement system was 3.9 mg/L, and linearity was confirmed for quantification values, ranging from 3.9 to 465 mg/L. Canine plasma samples (N = 39) were used to measure C-reactive protein (CRP) levels using the comparative method (x) and FIS (y). The regression equation between the measurements was y = 1.035 × - 0.002, with a correlation coefficient of 0.9809, indicating a significantly high correlation. Although the Brandt-Altman analysis suggested the possibility of a proportional systematic error between the two measurements, 38 of the 39 canine plasma samples measured fell within the acceptable range of error, indicating that the measurements are highly consistent. These results suggest that the analytical accuracy of the FIS constructed in this study and the quantitative value of canine CRP are equivalent to those of measurement systems using automated analyzers and immunoturbidimetric reagents.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.