ReviewPsychonomic bulletin & review2023
Cognitive strategies in matrix-reasoning tasks: State of the art.
Review in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Task Engagement in Matrix Reasoning Performance: A Cross-Cultural Investigation in China and the United Kingdom.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- From Abstract to Domain-Specific: Development and Validation of Matrix Reasoning Tasks for Students in Biology.Journal of Intelligence · 2026Article
- Sources of Individual Differences in Children's Matrix Problem-Solving Abilities: Evidence from Eye Movements.Journal of education and training studies · 2026Article
- Individual Differences in Strategy and the Item-Position Effect in Reasoning Ability Measures.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Exploring Critical Eye-Tracking Metrics for Identifying Cognitive Strategies in Raven's Advanced Progressive Matrices: A Data-Driven Perspective.Journal of Intelligence · 2025Article
- Differences in scanpath pattern and verbal working memory predicts efficient reading in the Cloze gap-filling test.Cognitive processing · 2024Article
- Protocol and preregistration for the CODEC project: measuring, modelling and mechanistically understanding the nature of cognitive variability in early childhood.BMC psychology · 2024Article
- Taking another look at intelligence and personality using an eye-tracking approach.NPJ science of learning · 2024Article
- Interindividual Differences in Cognitive Variability Are Ubiquitous and Distinct From Mean Performance in a Battery of Eleven Tasks.Journal of cognition · 2024Article
- Should Intelligence Tests Be Speeded or Unspeeded? A Brief Review of the Effects of Time Pressure on Response Processes and an Experimental Study with Raven's Matrices.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- Eye Gaze Patterns during Reasoning Provide Insights Regarding Individual Differences in Underlying Cognitive Abilities.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
- Construction and Validation of the HeiQ: An Operation-Oriented Figural Matrices Test.Journal of Intelligence · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cognitive strategies in matrix-reasoning tasks have been investigated for the last decade and a half. Several steps were made since the first paper in the field, but the advances have been sparse and with little connection. Here we present a review of the state of the art in this subject. We introduce how this topic was born and how to measure these strategies, covering the diverse methods and measures that are presented in the literature to progress on this subject and the applications that were developed, as well as the knowledge that resulted from these applications. Furthermore, the future directions are discussed with the intention to engage new researchers in this topic, as well as to bring awareness to limitations that were found given the available scientific literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
35931904What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.