Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35931558›Full record

ArticleInternational dental journal2023

Accuracy of the Intraoral Scanner for Detection of Tooth Wear.

Somsak Mitrirattanakul, Siew Peng Neoh, Jirasin Chalarmchaichaloenkit, Chirasit Limthanabodi, Chocktipat Trerayapiwat, Natdanai Pipatpajong, Norravit Taechushong, Rochaya Chintavalakorn

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International dental journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Somsak MitrirattanakulDepartment of Masticatory Science, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Siew Peng NeohDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Jirasin ChalarmchaichaloenkitFaculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chirasit LimthanabodiFaculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chocktipat TrerayapiwatFaculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Natdanai PipatpajongFaculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Norravit TaechushongFaculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Rochaya ChintavalakornDepartment of Orthodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand. Electronic address: dr.krittika@gmail.com.
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThe aim of this work was to study the accuracy of the intraoral scanner for detection of tooth wear in natural teeth by using micro-computed tomography (micro-CT) as a gold standard. MATERIALS AND

methodsTwenty premolars were prepared, fixed in acrylic blocks, and scanned with an intraoral scanner (iTero Element® 2) and micro-CT for baseline reference images before artificial tooth wear induction. The samples were then scrubbed with abrasive sandpaper 20 times and scanned with the intraoral scanner. They were then superimposed with the reference images utilising the "TimeLapse" feature of the scanner until the abraded area appeared yellow, indicating tooth surface loss in the 50-200 μm range. The same samples were then rescanned by micro-CT to measure the actual tooth surface loss. This procedure was repeated for the subsequent experimental tooth surface loss of 200-400 μm range (orange areas) and 400-750 μm range (red areas). The collected data were analysed for sensitivity, positive predictive value (PPV), and accuracy. Level of statistical significance was set at .05.

resultsIn the detection of experimental tooth surface loss, the specificity, PPV, and accuracy of the intraoral scanner were 98%, 98%, and 97%, respectively.

conclusionsThe iTero® intraoral scanner can be recommended to be a suitable screening tool for tooth wear in routine dental practice.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalTooth WearComputer-Aided DesignDental Impression TechniqueHumansX-Ray MicrotomographyAbrasionAccuracyIntraoral scanneriTero Element® 2Micro-computed tomographyTooth wear

Identifiers

PMID35931558
PMCPMC9875261
OpenAlexW4289527146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.