ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022
Impaired perceptual phonetic plasticity in Parkinson's disease.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Perceptual Training for People With Parkinson's Disease.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Parkinson's disease (PD) is a neurodegenerative condition primarily associated with its motor consequences. Although much of the focus within the speech domain has focused on PD's consequences for production, people with PD have been shown to differ in the perception of emotional prosody, loudness, and speech rate from age-matched controls. The current study targeted the effect of PD on perceptual phonetic plasticity, defined as the ability to learn and adjust to novel phonetic input, both in second language and native language contexts. People with PD were compared to age-matched controls (and, for three of the studies, a younger control population) in tasks of explicit non-native speech learning and adaptation to variation in native speech (compressed rate, accent, and the use of timing information within a sentence to parse ambiguities). The participants with PD showed significantly worse performance on the task of compressed rate and used the duration of an ambiguous fricative to segment speech to a lesser degree than age-matched controls, indicating impaired speech perceptual abilities. Exploratory comparisons also showed people with PD who were on medication performed significantly worse than their peers off medication on those two tasks and the task of explicit non-native learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.