ReviewThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022
Clinical and investigational tools for monitoring noise-induced hyperacusis.
Review in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Results of a 6-Month Field Trial of a Transitional Intervention for Debilitating Hyperacusis.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2024Trial
- Clinical features of chronic tension-type headache combined with hyperacusis: a cross-sectional study.Sao Paulo medical journal = Revista paulista de medicina · 2026Article
- Persian Pediatric Hyperacusis Questionnaire: Translation and Psychometric Evaluation in Children with and Without Autism.Journal of the American Academy of Audiology · 2025Article
- Clinical phenotype and management of sound-induced pain: Insights from adults with pain hyperacusis.The journal of pain · 2025Article
- Audiometric Profiles Across a Clinical Population of Children With Hyperacusis.American journal of audiology · 2024Article
- Clinical phenotype and management of sound-induced pain: Insights from adults with pain hyperacusis.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- Hyperacusis Diagnosis and Management in the United States: Clinical Audiology Practice Patterns.American journal of audiology · 2023Article
- Asymmetric hearing thresholds are associated with hyperacusis in a large clinical population.Hearing research · 2023Article
- Noise-induced hearing disorders: Clinical and investigational tools.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Hyperacusis is a recognized perceptual consequence of acoustic overexposure that can lead to debilitating psychosocial effects. Despite the profound impact of hyperacusis on quality of life, clinicians and researchers lack objective biomarkers and standardized protocols for its assessment. Outcomes of conventional audiologic tests are highly variable in the hyperacusis population and do not adequately capture the multifaceted nature of the condition on an individual level. This presents challenges for the differential diagnosis of hyperacusis, its clinical surveillance, and evaluation of new treatment options. Multiple behavioral and objective assays are emerging as contenders for inclusion in hyperacusis assessment protocols but most still await rigorous validation. There remains a pressing need to develop tools to quantify common nonauditory symptoms, including annoyance, fear, and pain. This review describes the current literature on clinical and investigational tools that have been used to diagnose and monitor hyperacusis, as well as those that hold promise for inclusion in future trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.