ArticleThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America2022
Oral vibratory sensations during voice production at different laryngeal and semi-occluded vocal tract configurations.
Article in The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Mechanisms of speaker adaptation to semi-occluded vocal tract exercises: Insights from computational phonation modeling.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2026Article
- Schlieren imaging and video classification of alphabet pronunciations: exploiting phonetic flows for speech recognition and speech therapy.Visual computing for industry, biomedicine, and art · 2024Article
- The influence of source-filter interaction on the voice source in a three-dimensional computational model of voice production.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Voice therapy often emphasizes vibratory sensations in the front part of the vocal tract during phonation to improve vocal efficiency. It remains unclear what laryngeal and vocal tract adjustments are elicited in speakers by this emphasis on oral vibratory sensations. Using a three-dimensional phonation model, this study aims to identify laryngeal and epilaryngeal adjustments that might produce maximal oral vibratory sensations during phonation, as quantified by the oral sound pressure level (SPL), and thus are likely to be elicited in voice therapy at different semi-occluded vocal tract configurations. Results show that maximum oral SPL occurs at intermediate vocal fold adduction configurations characterized by a trade-off between glottal gap and vocal fold vertical thickness. Epilaryngeal tube narrowing further increases the oral SPL in an open vocal tract, but has little effect on oral SPL in semi-occluded vocal tracts. Laryngeal and epilaryngeal configurations producing the maximum oral SPL generally have lower peak vocal fold contact pressure when producing a target output SPL. These favorable configurations are more easily identified in open vocal tracts than semi-occluded vocal tracts. However, semi-occlusion increases both the mean and dynamic oral pressure, which may familiarize speakers with oral vibratory sensations and facilitate adoption of favorable laryngeal configurations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.