Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35931321›Full record

ArticleMagnetic resonance imaging2022

Minimal number of sampling directions for robust measures of the spherical mean diffusion weighted signal: Effects of sampling directions, b-value, signal-to-noise ratio, hardware, and fitting strategy.

Kurt G Schilling, Marco Palombo, Kristin P O'Grady, Anna J E Combes, Adam W Anderson, Bennett A Landman, Seth A Smith

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Magnetic resonance imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Kurt G SchillingDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States. Electronic address: kurt.g.schilling.1@vumc.org.
Marco PalomboCardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre, School of Psychology, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; School of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom.
Kristin P O'GradyDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Anna J E CombesDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Adam W AndersonDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; School of Computer Science and Informatics, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Bennett A LandmanDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Electrical Engineering and Computer Engineering, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, United States.
Seth A SmithDepartment of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States; Vanderbilt University Institute of Imaging Science, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · USCardiff University · GBVanderbilt University · US

Funding

VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY CTSA FOR PEDIATRIC RESEARCHUL1RR024975 · NCRR · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI BERNARD, GORDON RAPHAEL · 2007 to 2011
$45.7M
Overall: Eunice Kennedy Shriver Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities Research Center at VanderbiltP50HD103537 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI Lea K Davis · 2020 to 2026
$10.3M
Controlling Quality and Capturing Uncertainty in Advanced Diffusion Weighted MRIR01EB017230 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY · PI LANDMAN, BENNETT A. · 2015 to 2024
$5.1M
Evaluating Advanced Diffusion of the Human Spinal Cord: Application to MSR01NS117816 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SETH A · 2021 to 2025
$1.8M
Structural and Functional MRI of the Cervical Spinal Cord in Multiple SclerosisR01NS109114 · NINDS · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SMITH, SETH A · 2018 to 2022
$1.7M
Microstructure and connectivity modeling from the cortex to the spinal cord in Multiple SclerosisK01EB032898 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI SCHILLING, KURT G · 2022 to 2025
$630k
Development of Advanced MRI for the Thoracolumbar Spinal Cord for Clinical ApplicationK01EB030039 · NIBIB · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI O'GRADY, KRISTIN POOLE · 2020 to 2023
$622k
Medical Research Council MR/T020296/1NCRR NIH HHS UL1 RR024975NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB030039NIBIB NIH HHS K01 EB032898NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017230NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD103537NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS109114NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS117816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Several recent multi-compartment diffusion MRI investigations and modeling strategies have utilized the orientationally-averaged, or spherical mean, diffusion-weighted signal to study tissue microstructure of the central nervous system. Most experimental designs sample a large number of diffusion weighted directions in order to calculate the spherical mean signal, however, sampling a subset of these directions may increase scanning efficiency and enable either a decrease in scan time or the ability to sample more diffusion weightings. Here, we aim to determine the minimum number of gradient directions needed for a robust measurement of the spherical mean signal. We used computer simulations to characterize the variation of the measured spherical mean signal as a function of the number of gradient directions, while also investigating the effects of diffusion weighting (b-value), signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), available hardware, and spherical mean fitting strategy. We then utilize empirically acquired data in the brain and spinal cord to validate simulations, showing experimental results are in good agreement with simulations. We summarize these results by providing an intuitive lookup table to facilitate the determination of the minimal number of sampling directions needed for robust spherical mean measurements, and give recommendations based on SNR and experimental conditions.

Indexed as

BrainDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingComputer SimulationDiffusionSignal-To-Noise RatioDiffusivityOptimal samplingSpherical mean signalVolume fraction

Identifiers

PMID35931321
PMCPMC9904413
OpenAlexW4289527313

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.