ArticleNeuroImage2022
What has vision science taught us about functional MRI?
Article in NeuroImage, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Do microsaccades vary with discriminability around the visual field?bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Limitations of 2-dimensional line-scan MRI for directly measuring neural activity.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2024Article
- BOLD Response is more than just magnitude: Improving detection sensitivity through capturing hemodynamic profiles.NeuroImage · 2023Article
- Polar angle asymmetries in visual perception and neural architecture.Trends in neurosciences · 2023Review
- Article
- Comparing retinotopic maps of children and adults reveals a late-stage change in how V1 samples the visual field.Nature communications · 2023Article
- What multiplexing means for the interpretation of functional MRI data.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Linking individual differences in human primary visual cortex to contrast sensitivity around the visual field.Nature communications · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the domain of human neuroimaging, much attention has been paid to the question of whether and how the development of functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) has advanced our scientific knowledge of the human brain. However, the opposite question is also important; how has our knowledge of the brain advanced our understanding of fMRI? Here, we discuss how and why scientific knowledge about the human and animal visual system has been used to answer fundamental questions about fMRI as a brain measurement tool and how these answers have contributed to scientific discoveries beyond vision science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.