Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35930884›Full record

ArticleJournal of environmental management2022

Maintaining a social license to operate for wastewater-based monitoring: The case of managing infectious disease and the COVID-19 pandemic.

Bethany Cooper, Erica Donner, Lin Crase, Hamish Robertson, David Carter, Michael Short, Barbara Drigo, Karin Leder, Anne Roiko, Kelly Fielding

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of environmental management, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Structured Ethical Review for Wastewater-Based Testing.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. A Scoping Review on the Ethics of Wastewater Surveillance for COVID-19.Journal of public health management and practice : JPHMP
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Bethany CooperUniversity of South Australia, School of Business, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. Electronic address: bethany.cooper@unisa.edu.au.
Erica DonnerUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. Electronic address: erica.donnor@unisa.edu.au.
Lin CraseUniversity of South Australia, School of Business, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. Electronic address: lin.crase@unisa.edu.au.
Hamish RobertsonUniversity of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Health, 15 Broadway Ultimo, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: hamish.robertson@uts.edu.au.
David CarterUniversity of Technology Sydney, Faculty of Law, 15 Broadway Ultimo, NSW, Australia. Electronic address: david.carter@uts.edu.au.
Michael ShortUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. Electronic address: michael.short@unisa.edu.au.
Barbara DrigoUniversity of South Australia, Future Industries Institute, GPO Box 2471, Adelaide, South Australia, 5001, Australia. Electronic address: barbara.drigo@unisa.edu.au.
Karin LederMonash University, School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia. Electronic address: karin.leder@monash.edu.
Anne RoikoGriffith University, School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Gold Coast, QLD, 4222, Australia. Electronic address: a.roiko@griffith.edu.au.
Kelly FieldingThe University of Queensland, School of Communication and Arts, St Lucia, QLD, 4072, Australia. Electronic address: k.fielding@uq.edu.au.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Wastewater monitoring as a public health tool is well-established and the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic has seen its widespread uptake. Given the significant potential of wastewater monitoring as a public health surveillance and decision support tool, it is important to understand what measures are required to allow the long-term benefits of wastewater monitoring to be fully realized, including how to establish and/or maintain public support. The potential for positive SARS-CoV-2 detections to trigger enforced, community-wide public health interventions (e.g., lockdowns and other impacts on civil liberties) further emphasises the need to better understand the role of public engagement in successful wastewater-based monitoring programs. This paper systematically reviews the processes of building and maintaining the social license to operate wastewater monitoring. We specifically explore the relationship between different stakeholder communities and highlight the information and actions that are required to establish a social license to operate and then prevent its loss. The paper adds to the literature on social license to operate by extending its application to new domains and offers a dynamic model of social license to help guide the agenda for researcher and practitioner communities.

Indexed as

Communicable DiseasesCOVID-19Communicable Disease ControlHumansPandemicsSARS-CoV-2WastewaterWastewaterCOVID-19PandemicSocial license to operateWastewater-based epidemiologyWastewater monitoring and managementWastewater surveillance

Identifiers

PMID35930884
PMCPMC9304157

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.