ArticleThe Journal of urology2022
Satisfaction With Clinician-Led Germline Genetic Counseling in Patients With Prostate Cancer.
Article in The Journal of urology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Genetic counseling services for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer: patients' experience and satisfaction with different service models.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
- Mainstream and fast-track genetic testing in pancreatic cancer patients and its impact on treatment: our experience in a tertiary hospital in Spain.Familial cancer · 2026Observational
- Using patient-reported outcomes from the PROCLAIM trial to assess the impact of universal germline genetic testing for prostate cancer patients.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Article
- Experiences of metastatic prostate cancer patients with a mainstream genetic testing pathway.International journal of cancer · 2026Article
- Exploring Factors That Impact Genetic Counseling Referral and Uptake Using Learning Health Approaches.Learning health systems · 2026Article
- Experience of urologists, oncologists and nurse practitioners with mainstream genetic testing in metastatic prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2025Article
- Germline testing for prostate cancer: current state and opportunities for enhanced access.EBioMedicine · 2025Review
- Implementation of Universal Germline Genetic Testing Into Standard of Care for Patients With Prostate Cancer: The Time Is Now.JCO oncology practice · 2025Article
- Detection of Germline Variants in Patients With Localized and Metastatic Prostate Cancer Through Guideline-Based Testing.Urology practice · 2025Article
- Clinical Impact of a Rapid Genetic Testing Model for Advanced Prostate Cancer Patients.The Journal of urology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
16 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
purposeIndications for germline testing in prostate cancer patients have expanded substantially over the past decade. With a near-universal shortage of genetic counselors and increasing demand, increased access to genetic counseling is crucial. We sought to prospectively implement and assess a clinician-led approach to genetic counseling and testing. MATERIALS AND
methodsPatients with metastatic or localized prostate cancer meeting National Comprehensive Cancer Network® criteria for consideration of genetic testing were offered pre-test genetic counseling by their urologist or medical oncologist as part of their routine clinical care and concurrently approached for enrollment in the Germline Genetics in Prostate Cancer Study. Consented patients filled out a post-counseling survey using validated instruments to assess the quality of counseling. For patients who elected to undergo genetic testing, an additional validated questionnaire was completed following disclosure of results. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients undergoing testing, with a target >60% of patients. The secondary outcome was overall satisfaction with counseling, with a target >85% of patients.
resultsA total of 275 patients enrolled, and 203 patients elected to undergo genetic testing. Post-counseling surveys were obtained from 265 patients, and post-genetic testing surveys were obtained from 132 patients. Patient satisfaction was high, with 98% of patients reporting being satisfied with the overall quality of pre-test counseling, and 74% of patients elected to undergo genetic testing.
conclusionsThese results support the effectiveness of clinician-led genetic counseling in prostate cancer. With clinician training, this approach can be utilized to expand access to appropriate germline genetic testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.