Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35930677›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. A2022

Benefits of Range-Separated Hybrid and Double-Hybrid Functionals for a Large and Diverse Data Set of Reaction Energies and Barrier Heights.

Golokesh Santra, Rivka Calinsky, Jan M L Martin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. A, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Modulation of the Product Upon the Reaction of COJournal of computational chemistry · 2025
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Combined DFT and Kinetic Monte Carlo Study of UiO-66 Catalysts for γ-Valerolactone Production.The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Golokesh SantraDepartment of Molecular Chemistry and Materials Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Reḥovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-7297-8767
Rivka CalinskyDepartment of Molecular Chemistry and Materials Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Reḥovot, Israel.
Jan M L MartinDepartment of Molecular Chemistry and Materials Science, Weizmann Institute of Science, 7610001 Reḥovot, Israel.ORCID 0000-0002-0005-5074

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To better understand the thermochemical kinetics and mechanism of a specific chemical reaction, an accurate estimation of barrier heights (forward and reverse) and reaction energies is vital. Because of the large size of reactants and transition state structures involved in real-life mechanistic studies (e.g., enzymatically catalyzed reactions), density functional theory remains the workhorse for such calculations. In this paper, we have assessed the performance of 91 density functionals for modeling the reaction energies and barrier heights on a large and chemically diverse data set (BH9) composed of 449 organic chemistry reactions. We have shown that range-separated hybrid functionals perform better than the global hybrids for BH9 barrier heights and reaction energies. Except for the PBE-based range-separated nonempirical double hybrids, range separation of the exchange term helps improve the performance for barrier heights and reaction energies. The 16-parameter Berkeley double hybrid, ωB97M(2), performs remarkably well for both properties. However, our minimally empirical range-separated double hybrid functionals offer marginally better accuracy than ωB97M(2) for BH9 barrier heights and reaction energies.

Identifiers

PMID35930677
PMCPMC9393870

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.